Stainless Steel Shoe Rack: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Stainless Steel Shoe Rack on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 1Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 1
Closed in period: 6
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

0 Mar 2026

0 Apr 2026

1 May 2026

1 Jun 2026

22 Jul 2026

0 Aug 2026

1 Sept 2026

1 Oct 2026

1 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	0
Apr 2026	0
May 2026	1
Jun 2026	1
Jul 2026	2
Aug 2026	0
Sept 2026	1
Oct 2026	1
Nov 2026	1

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 100%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 100%
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Stainless Steel Shoe Rack73/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Classroom Stools55/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
PUF Panel35/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Stainless Steel Shoe Rack	73	1	6	—	—
2	Classroom Stools	55	1	0	—	—
3	PUF Panel	35	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Stainless Steel Shoe Rack100/100
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Stainless Steel Shoe Rack	100	1	6	—	—

1
Department of Military Affairs73/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
88
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Medical Education Department Uttar Pradesh64/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Defence44/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Space44/100
Department of Space ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Education Department Gujarat44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Health & Family Welfare Department Gujarat44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	73	0	2	—	—
2	Medical Education Department Uttar Pradesh	64	1	0	—	—
3	Department of Defence	44	0	1	—	—
4	Department of Space	44	0	1	—	—
5	Education Department Gujarat	44	0	1	—	—
6	Health & Family Welfare Department Gujarat	44	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence74/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
58
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Space40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	74	0	3	—	—
2	Department of Space	40	0	1	—	—

1
Uttar Pradesh64/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
West Bengal64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Gujarat55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Assam44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Himachal Pradesh44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Kerala44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Uttar Pradesh	64	1	0	—	—
2	West Bengal	64	0	1	—	—
3	Gujarat	55	0	2	—	—
4	Assam	44	0	1	—	—
5	Himachal Pradesh	44	0	1	—	—
6	Kerala	44	0	1	—	—

1
Kanpur Nagar75/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Jalpaiguri75/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Sonitpur55/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Gandhi Nagar55/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Narmada55/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Kinnaur55/100
Himachal Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Thiruvananthapuram55/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Kanpur Nagar	75	1	0	—	—
2	Jalpaiguri	75	0	1	—	—
3	Sonitpur	55	0	1	—	—
4	Gandhi Nagar	55	0	1	—	—
5	Narmada	55	0	1	—	—
6	Kinnaur	55	0	1	—	—
7	Thiruvananthapuram	55	0	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Stainless Steel Shoe Rack: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor