PUF Panel: GeM business opportunity
Who buys PUF Panel on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 3
- Closed in period
- 35
- Awarded results
- 1
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹61,950
- Avg bidders per bid
- 3
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 1 |
| Apr 2026 | 0 |
| May 2026 | 6 |
| Jun 2026 | 5 |
| Jul 2026 | 6 |
| Aug 2026 | 3 |
| Sept 2026 | 4 |
| Oct 2026 | 11 |
| Nov 2026 | 2 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 74%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 0%
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 35 bids
based on 1 bids
based on 35 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1PUF Panel72/100
3 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹61,950
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 94
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2School Bags (V2)31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ceiling rose - IS 37131/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Glass Fuse31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Silicone sealant31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Polling Material Kit31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PUF Panel | 72 | 3 | 35 | 3 | ₹61,950 |
| 2 | School Bags (V2) | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Ceiling rose - IS 371 | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Glass Fuse | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Advance Technology for Building Protection Lightning Arrester | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Stainless Steel Shoe Rack | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Silicone sealant | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Bottle Water Plastic with Cover (DEFENCE) | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Polling Material Kit | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1PUF Panel94/100
3 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹61,950 · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 94
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PUF Panel | 94 | 3 | 35 | 3 | ₹61,950 |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·0 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹61,950
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 79
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 54
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 67
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Department of Defence53/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 70
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
Department of Atomic Energy ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 54
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 54
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
Ministry of Science and Technology ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 78 | 0 | 12 | 3 | ₹61,950 |
| 2 | Forests and Environment Department Gujarat | 64 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Horticulture Department Uttarakhand | 58 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Department of Defence | 53 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of Atomic Energy | 53 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 6 | Central Armed Police Forces | 49 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 7 | Prisons Administration and Reforms Department Uttar Pradesh | 49 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 8 | Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh | 38 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Department of Biotechnology (dbt) | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Social Welfare Department Jammu and Kashmir | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence74/100
0 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹61,950
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 56
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Home Affairs47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 48
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 74 | 0 | 17 | 3 | ₹61,950 |
| 2 | Department of Atomic Energy | 52 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Home Affairs | 47 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Science and Technology | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1West Bengal69/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Gujarat67/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 95
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 75
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Uttar Pradesh66/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 17
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Uttarakhand58/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 44
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Maharashtra57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 44
- Momentum
- 95
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Himachal Pradesh56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Bihar38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 44
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Punjab38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 44
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Chhattisgarh33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Haryana33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | West Bengal | 69 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 2 | Gujarat | 67 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Uttar Pradesh | 66 | 0 | 11 | — | — |
| 4 | Uttarakhand | 58 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Maharashtra | 57 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Himachal Pradesh | 56 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 7 | Bihar | 38 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Punjab | 38 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Chhattisgarh | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Haryana | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Jalpaiguri78/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ahmedabad73/100
Gujarat ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 67
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Udham Singh Nagar65/100
Uttarakhand ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Kinnaur63/100
Himachal Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Varanasi58/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Thane58/100
Maharashtra ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Allahabad58/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Kangra45/100
Himachal Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Ludhiana45/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Jhansi45/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jalpaiguri | 78 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 2 | Ahmedabad | 73 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Udham Singh Nagar | 65 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Kinnaur | 63 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 5 | Varanasi | 58 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Thane | 58 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 7 | Allahabad | 58 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Kangra | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Ludhiana | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Jhansi | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
1 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesof 1 awarded bids with the MSE flag
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.