Horticulture Service - Maintenance Based Model: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Horticulture Service - Maintenance Based Model on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 9Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 9
Closed in period: 96
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

5 Mar 2026

10 Apr 2026

11 May 2026

12 Jun 2026

1919 Jul 2026

17 Aug 2026

16 Sept 2026

9 Oct 2026

6 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	5
Apr 2026	10
May 2026	11
Jun 2026	12
Jul 2026	19
Aug 2026	17
Sept 2026	16
Oct 2026	9
Nov 2026	6

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 18%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 100%
Reverse auction: 1%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Horticulture Service - Maintenance Based Model73/100
9 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Custom Bid for Services61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Facility Management Service- Manpower based (Version 2)56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
47
Momentum
47
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Cleaning, Sanitation and Disinfection Service - Outcome Based43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
35
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Facility Management Services - LumpSum Based41/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Manpower Outsourcing Services - Man-days based41/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Manpower Outsourcing Services - Minimum wage32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Collection & Disposal Waste Management Service29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Hiring of Sanitation Service - Manpower Based Model29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Manpower Outsourcing Services - Fixed Remuneration29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Horticulture Service - Maintenance Based Model	73	9	96	—	—
2	Custom Bid for Services	61	0	3	—	—
3	Facility Management Service- Manpower based (Version 2)	56	0	8	—	—
4	Cleaning, Sanitation and Disinfection Service - Outcome Based	43	0	4	—	—
5	Facility Management Services - LumpSum Based	41	0	3	—	—
6	Manpower Outsourcing Services - Man-days based	41	0	3	—	—
7	Manpower Outsourcing Services - Minimum wage	32	0	2	—	—
8	Collection & Disposal Waste Management Service	29	0	1	—	—
9	Hiring of Sanitation Service - Manpower Based Model	29	0	1	—	—
10	Manpower Outsourcing Services - Fixed Remuneration	29	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Horticulture Service - Maintenance Based Model100/100
9 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Custom Bid for Services100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Facility Management Service- Manpower based (Version 2)100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
47
Momentum
47
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Cleaning, Sanitation and Disinfection Service - Outcome Based100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
35
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Facility Management Services - LumpSum Based100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Manpower Outsourcing Services - Man-days based100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Horticulture Service - Maintenance Based Model	100	9	96	—	—
2	Custom Bid for Services	100	0	3	—	—
3	Facility Management Service- Manpower based (Version 2)	100	0	8	—	—
4	Cleaning, Sanitation and Disinfection Service - Outcome Based	100	0	4	—	—
5	Facility Management Services - LumpSum Based	100	0	3	—	—
6	Manpower Outsourcing Services - Man-days based	100	0	3	—	—

1
Department of Military Affairs73/100
Ministry of Defence ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
54
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Power Grid Corporation of India Limited68/100
Ministry of Power ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Indian Railways60/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Defence54/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Atomic Energy54/100
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Railways Public Sector Undertakings50/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
59
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Energy Department Uttar Pradesh50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
59
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of Commerce48/100
Ministry of Commerce and Industry ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Department of Financial Services48/100
Ministry of Finance ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Department of Revenue48/100
Ministry of Finance ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	73	1	13	—	—
2	Power Grid Corporation of India Limited	68	0	3	—	—
3	Indian Railways	60	0	3	—	—
4	Department of Defence	54	0	6	—	—
5	Department of Atomic Energy	54	0	6	—	—
6	Railways Public Sector Undertakings	50	0	4	—	—
7	Energy Department Uttar Pradesh	50	0	4	—	—
8	Department of Commerce	48	0	3	—	—
9	Department of Financial Services	48	0	3	—	—
10	Department of Revenue	48	0	3	—	—

1
Ministry of Power72/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
66
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Defence69/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
34
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Culture63/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
42
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Railways63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
66
Momentum
54
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Science and Technology58/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
35
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Jal Shakti56/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
35
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Labour and Employment52/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
22
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Information and Broadcasting52/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
22
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ministry of Finance51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
62
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Power	72	1	6	—	—
2	Ministry of Defence	69	1	21	—	—
3	Ministry of Culture	63	1	8	—	—
4	Ministry of Railways	63	0	7	—	—
5	Ministry of Science and Technology	58	1	2	—	—
6	Ministry of Health and Family Welfare	56	0	2	—	—
7	Ministry of Jal Shakti	56	1	1	—	—
8	Ministry of Labour and Employment	52	1	0	—	—
9	Ministry of Information and Broadcasting	52	1	0	—	—
10	Ministry of Finance	51	0	6	—	—

1
Gujarat72/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
83
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Madhya Pradesh72/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
83
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Tamil Nadu72/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
West Bengal72/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Telangana67/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
94
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Delhi64/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
47
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Karnataka64/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
63
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Uttar Pradesh63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Chhattisgarh59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
46
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Rajasthan59/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
46
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Gujarat	72	2	7	—	—
2	Madhya Pradesh	72	1	8	—	—
3	Tamil Nadu	72	0	6	—	—
4	West Bengal	72	1	5	—	—
5	Telangana	67	1	3	—	—
6	Delhi	64	1	7	—	—
7	Karnataka	64	1	5	—	—
8	Uttar Pradesh	63	0	19	—	—
9	Chhattisgarh	59	0	3	—	—
10	Rajasthan	59	1	2	—	—

1
Chennai78/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
94
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Kolkata78/100
West Bengal ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
94
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Raipur68/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Dhar68/100
Madhya Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Visakhapatnam63/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Lucknow59/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Krishna56/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Central Delhi56/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
New Delhi56/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Bangalore56/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Chennai	78	0	4	—	—
2	Kolkata	78	1	3	—	—
3	Raipur	68	0	3	—	—
4	Dhar	68	1	2	—	—
5	Visakhapatnam	63	0	5	—	—
6	Lucknow	59	0	4	—	—
7	Krishna	56	0	3	—	—
8	Central Delhi	56	0	3	—	—
9	New Delhi	56	0	3	—	—
10	Bangalore	56	0	3	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Horticulture Service - Maintenance Based Model: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor