Facility Management Service- Manpower based (Version 2): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Facility Management Service- Manpower based (Version 2) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 63
- Closed in period
- 934
- Awarded results
- 4
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹32 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 27.3
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 2 |
| Mar 2026 | 42 |
| Apr 2026 | 112 |
| May 2026 | 147 |
| Jun 2026 | 152 |
| Jul 2026 | 159 |
| Aug 2026 | 120 |
| Sept 2026 | 112 |
| Oct 2026 | 119 |
| Nov 2026 | 32 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 27%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 40%
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 948 bids
based on 10 bids
based on 925 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
63 live · 27.3 bidders avg · L1 ₹32 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 0
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value
- 100
- 2
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 42
- Momentum
- 76
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 57
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 54
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 45
- Momentum
- 20
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 51
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 10
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Housekeeping Services40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 26
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Facility Management Service- Manpower based (Version 2) | 65 | 63 | 934 | 27.3 | ₹32 lakh |
| 2 | Facility Management Services - LumpSum Based | 60 | 2 | 15 | — | — |
| 3 | Manpower Outsourcing Services - Minimum wage | 56 | 1 | 14 | — | — |
| 4 | Horticulture Service - Maintenance Based Model | 53 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 5 | Manpower Outsourcing Services - Man-days based | 50 | 1 | 21 | — | — |
| 6 | Facility Management Service - Outcome Based | 48 | 0 | 33 | — | — |
| 7 | Customized AMC/CMC for Pre-owned Products | 48 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 8 | Manpower Outsourcing Services - Fixed Remuneration | 44 | 1 | 13 | — | — |
| 9 | Housekeeping Services | 40 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 10 | AMC of Integrated Security and Surveillance System | 39 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
2 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 42
- Momentum
- 76
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 57
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 54
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 45
- Momentum
- 20
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 51
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Housekeeping Services100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 26
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
63 live · 27.3 bidders avg · L1 ₹32 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 0
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value
- 100
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Facility Management Services - LumpSum Based | 100 | 2 | 15 | — | — |
| 2 | Manpower Outsourcing Services - Minimum wage | 100 | 1 | 14 | — | — |
| 3 | Horticulture Service - Maintenance Based Model | 100 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 4 | Manpower Outsourcing Services - Man-days based | 100 | 1 | 21 | — | — |
| 5 | Facility Management Service - Outcome Based | 100 | 0 | 33 | — | — |
| 6 | Manpower Outsourcing Services - Fixed Remuneration | 100 | 1 | 13 | — | — |
| 7 | Housekeeping Services | 100 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 8 | AMC of Integrated Security and Surveillance System | 100 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 9 | Facility Management Service- Manpower based (Version 2) | 30 | 63 | 934 | 27.3 | ₹32 lakh |
- 1
Ministry of Finance ·15 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹21 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 97
- Momentum
- 94
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Indian Railways75/100
Ministry of Railways ·4 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 84
- Momentum
- 88
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
Ministry of Power ·3 live · 147 bidders avg · L1 ₹43 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 81
- Momentum
- 80
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
Ministry of Defence ·4 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 41
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
Ministry of Education ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 94
- Momentum
- 39
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
Pmo ·5 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 76
- Momentum
- 63
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 94
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 45
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 45
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Department of Revenue63/100
Ministry of Finance ·0 live · 6 bidders avg · L1 ₹37 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 72
- Momentum
- 46
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 55
- Momentum
- 72
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Financial Services | 80 | 15 | 76 | 3 | ₹21 lakh |
| 2 | Indian Railways | 75 | 4 | 45 | 1 | — |
| 3 | Power Grid Corporation of India Limited | 73 | 3 | 40 | 147 | ₹43 lakh |
| 4 | Department of Military Affairs | 71 | 4 | 102 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of School Education and Literacy | 68 | 2 | 76 | — | — |
| 6 | Department of Atomic Energy | 67 | 5 | 29 | — | — |
| 7 | Department of Fertilizers | 66 | 1 | 6 | — | — |
| 8 | Social Welfare (sanik Kalyan) Department Uttar Pradesh | 66 | 1 | 6 | — | — |
| 9 | Department of Revenue | 63 | 0 | 28 | 6 | ₹37 lakh |
| 10 | Department of Heavy Industry | 63 | 1 | 11 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Finance90/100
17 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹21 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 97
- Momentum
- 86
- Low competition
- 77
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value
- 100
- 2Ministry of Railways74/100
4 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 80
- Momentum
- 89
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Defence70/100
6 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 39
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Power68/100
3 live · 74 bidders avg · L1 ₹43 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 92
- Momentum
- 40
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Ministry of Education66/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 34
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Pmo66/100
5 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 63
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 94
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 48
- Momentum
- 86
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Finance | 90 | 17 | 108 | 5 | ₹21 lakh |
| 2 | Ministry of Railways | 74 | 4 | 49 | 1 | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Defence | 70 | 6 | 139 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Power | 68 | 3 | 94 | 74 | ₹43 lakh |
| 5 | Ministry of Education | 66 | 2 | 87 | — | — |
| 6 | Pmo | 66 | 5 | 29 | — | — |
| 7 | Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers | 66 | 1 | 8 | — | — |
| 8 | Ministry of Law and Justice | 66 | 1 | 8 | — | — |
| 9 | Ministry of Labour and Employment | 64 | 1 | 9 | — | — |
| 10 | Comptroller and Auditor General (cag) of India | 63 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
- 1Uttar Pradesh74/100
13 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 58
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Karnataka74/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 73
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Chandigarh72/100
8 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 64
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Delhi70/100
5 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 70
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Gujarat70/100
5 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 73
- Momentum
- 78
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Madhya Pradesh69/100
2 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 83
- Momentum
- 57
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Maharashtra68/100
8 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 83
- Momentum
- 58
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 96
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8West Bengal67/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 76
- Momentum
- 59
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Chhattisgarh65/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 48
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 89
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Odisha64/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 75
- Momentum
- 43
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uttar Pradesh | 74 | 13 | 172 | — | — |
| 2 | Karnataka | 74 | 3 | 42 | — | — |
| 3 | Chandigarh | 72 | 8 | 19 | — | — |
| 4 | Delhi | 70 | 5 | 50 | — | — |
| 5 | Gujarat | 70 | 5 | 39 | — | — |
| 6 | Madhya Pradesh | 69 | 2 | 73 | 1 | — |
| 7 | Maharashtra | 68 | 8 | 66 | — | — |
| 8 | West Bengal | 67 | 4 | 47 | — | — |
| 9 | Chhattisgarh | 65 | 3 | 8 | — | — |
| 10 | Odisha | 64 | 3 | 47 | — | — |
- 1Chandigarh79/100
Chandigarh ·8 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 89
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Bangalore77/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 91
- Momentum
- 86
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Lucknow74/100
Uttar Pradesh ·5 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 61
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 97
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Thane74/100
Maharashtra ·5 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 87
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Bhopal73/100
Madhya Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Gautam Buddha Nagar73/100
Uttar Pradesh ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Ahmedabad72/100
Gujarat ·4 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 64
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Bareilly72/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 64
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9South Delhi70/100
Delhi ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 95
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Varanasi70/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 95
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chandigarh | 79 | 8 | 19 | — | — |
| 2 | Bangalore | 77 | 0 | 30 | — | — |
| 3 | Lucknow | 74 | 5 | 37 | — | — |
| 4 | Thane | 74 | 5 | 13 | — | — |
| 5 | Bhopal | 73 | 1 | 11 | — | — |
| 6 | Gautam Buddha Nagar | 73 | 2 | 10 | — | — |
| 7 | Ahmedabad | 72 | 4 | 6 | — | — |
| 8 | Bareilly | 72 | 1 | 9 | — | — |
| 9 | South Delhi | 70 | 1 | 8 | — | — |
| 10 | Varanasi | 70 | 1 | 8 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
4 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesof 147 awarded bids with the MSE flag
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.