Group Mediclaim Insurance Service: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Group Mediclaim Insurance Service on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 10Awarded results: 2Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 10
Closed in period: 115
Awarded results: 2
Median winning price (L1): ₹1.9 crore
Avg bidders per bid: 4.5

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

7 Mar 2026

12 Apr 2026

16 May 2026

2525 Jun 2026

16 Jul 2026

8 Aug 2026

24 Sept 2026

14 Oct 2026

3 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	7
Apr 2026	12
May 2026	16
Jun 2026	25
Jul 2026	16
Aug 2026	8
Sept 2026	24
Oct 2026	14
Nov 2026	3

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 75%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 11%
Reverse auction: 2%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Group Mediclaim Insurance Service72/100
10 live · 4.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.9 crore
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
98
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Group Personal Accident Insurance Service45/100
0 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹5.1 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
40
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Group Mediclaim Insurance Service	72	10	115	4.5	₹1.9 crore
2	Group Personal Accident Insurance Service	45	0	6	5	₹5.1 lakh

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Group Personal Accident Insurance Service100/100
0 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹5.1 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
40
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Group Mediclaim Insurance Service98/100
10 live · 4.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.9 crore · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
98
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Group Personal Accident Insurance Service	100	0	6	5	₹5.1 lakh
2	Group Mediclaim Insurance Service	98	10	115	4.5	₹1.9 crore

1
Department of Commerce67/100
Ministry of Commerce and Industry ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
49
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Higher Education66/100
Ministry of Education ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
18
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Water Resources River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation58/100
Ministry of Jal Shakti ·1 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹3.7 crore
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare55/100
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Labour Department Maharashtra55/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Department of Statistics and Programme Implementation51/100
Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
21
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Economic Affairs51/100
Ministry of Finance ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
21
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Green Gas Limited51/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
21
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Regional Rural Banks50/100
Ministry of Finance ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
59
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Department of Financial Services49/100
Ministry of Finance ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Commerce	67	0	4	—	—
2	Department of Higher Education	66	1	25	—	—
3	Department of Water Resources River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation	58	1	2	4	₹3.7 crore
4	Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare	55	0	2	—	—
5	Labour Department Maharashtra	55	1	1	—	—
6	Department of Statistics and Programme Implementation	51	1	0	—	—
7	Department of Economic Affairs	51	1	0	—	—
8	Green Gas Limited	51	1	0	—	—
9	Regional Rural Banks	50	0	6	—	—
10	Department of Financial Services	49	0	5	—	—

1
Ministry of Textiles73/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare68/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
96
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Education66/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
18
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Finance64/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
84
Momentum
32
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Commerce and Industry64/100
0 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹5.1 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
53
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas64/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
53
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Jal Shakti58/100
1 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹3.7 crore
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Power47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
49
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ministry of Railways45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Textiles	73	2	7	—	—
2	Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare	68	0	5	—	—
3	Ministry of Education	66	1	25	—	—
4	Ministry of Finance	64	1	14	—	—
5	Ministry of Commerce and Industry	64	0	9	5	₹5.1 lakh
6	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	64	1	8	—	—
7	Ministry of Jal Shakti	58	1	2	4	₹3.7 crore
8	Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers	49	0	5	—	—
9	Ministry of Power	47	0	4	—	—
10	Ministry of Railways	45	0	3	—	—

1
Maharashtra74/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
82
Momentum
87
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Madhya Pradesh72/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
64
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
West Bengal69/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
59
Momentum
96
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Delhi67/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
24
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Rajasthan66/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
46
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Haryana65/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
87
Momentum
37
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
92
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Uttar Pradesh65/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
84
Momentum
40
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
92
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Gujarat54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Karnataka54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Telangana53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Maharashtra	74	1	10	—	—
2	Madhya Pradesh	72	0	6	—	—
3	West Bengal	69	1	4	—	—
4	Delhi	67	0	20	—	—
5	Rajasthan	66	1	2	—	—
6	Haryana	65	1	12	—	—
7	Uttar Pradesh	65	2	10	—	—
8	Gujarat	54	0	8	—	—
9	Karnataka	54	0	8	—	—
10	Telangana	53	0	7	—	—

1
Mumbai80/100
Maharashtra ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
92
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Lucknow73/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Gurgaon70/100
Haryana ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
87
Momentum
69
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
86
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Kolkata70/100
West Bengal ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
58
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Central Delhi63/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Hyderabad55/100
Telangana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
75
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Bharuch53/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
South West Delhi50/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
58
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Bangalore50/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
58
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Dharward50/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
58
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Mumbai	80	1	7	—	—
2	Lucknow	73	1	3	—	—
3	Gurgaon	70	1	6	—	—
4	Kolkata	70	1	2	—	—
5	Central Delhi	63	0	10	—	—
6	Hyderabad	55	0	5	—	—
7	Bharuch	53	0	4	—	—
8	South West Delhi	50	0	3	—	—
9	Bangalore	50	0	3	—	—
10	Dharward	50	0	3	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

2 wins

1 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

Bids won by MSE sellers0%

of 2 awarded bids with the MSE flag

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Group Mediclaim Insurance Service: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor