Fine Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 383: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Fine Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 383 on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 13Awarded results: 3Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 13
Closed in period: 33
Awarded results: 3
Median winning price (L1): ₹16 lakh
Avg bidders per bid: 1.7

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

1 Mar 2026

2 Apr 2026

7 May 2026

3 Jun 2026

8 Jul 2026

4 Aug 2026

4 Sept 2026

7 Oct 2026

1010 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	1
Apr 2026	2
May 2026	7
Jun 2026	3
Jul 2026	8
Aug 2026	4
Sept 2026	4
Oct 2026	7
Nov 2026	10

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 50%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 0%
Reverse auction: 21%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Fine Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 38389/100
13 live · 1.7 bidders avg · L1 ₹16 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
100
Easy criteria
95
Order value
100
2
Coarse Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 38357/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
76
Momentum
8
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Fine Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 383	89	13	33	1.7	₹16 lakh
2	Coarse Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 383	57	0	18	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Coarse Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 383100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
76
Momentum
8
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Fine Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 38399/100
13 live · 1.7 bidders avg · L1 ₹16 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
100
Easy criteria
95
Order value
100

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Coarse Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 383	100	0	18	—	—
2	Fine Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 383	99	13	33	1.7	₹16 lakh

1
Department of Military Affairs80/100
Ministry of Defence ·10 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
91
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Defence63/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹49 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Forest Department Chhattisgarh60/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
62
Momentum
81
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Agriculture and Bio Technology56/100
0 live · 1 bidders avg · L1 ₹15 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
38
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Heavy Industry52/100
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Revenue Department Andaman & Nicobar52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Defence Production36/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
38
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Indian Railways32/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Bhakra Beas Managemet Board32/100
Ministry of Power ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Department of Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh Affairs32/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	80	10	3	—	—
2	Department of Defence	63	0	17	3	₹49 lakh
3	Forest Department Chhattisgarh	60	3	2	—	—
4	Department of Agriculture and Bio Technology	56	0	2	1	₹15 lakh
5	Department of Heavy Industry	52	0	1	—	—
6	Revenue Department Andaman & Nicobar	52	0	1	—	—
7	Department of Defence Production	36	0	2	—	—
8	Indian Railways	32	0	1	—	—
9	Bhakra Beas Managemet Board	32	0	1	—	—
10	Department of Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh Affairs	32	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence71/100
10 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹49 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
42
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Home Affairs31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Power31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Railways31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	71	10	22	3	₹49 lakh
2	Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises	51	0	1	—	—
3	Ministry of Home Affairs	31	0	1	—	—
4	Ministry of Power	31	0	1	—	—
5	Ministry of Railways	31	0	1	—	—

1
West Bengal78/100
10 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Uttarakhand63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Chhattisgarh61/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
81
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Madhya Pradesh53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Assam50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
40
Momentum
68
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Rajasthan48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Haryana33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Himachal Pradesh33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Jammu & Kashmir33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Karnataka33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	West Bengal	78	10	0	—	—
2	Uttarakhand	63	0	15	—	—
3	Chhattisgarh	61	3	2	—	—
4	Madhya Pradesh	53	0	1	—	—
5	Assam	50	0	2	—	—
6	Rajasthan	48	0	3	—	—
7	Haryana	33	0	1	—	—
8	Himachal Pradesh	33	0	1	—	—
9	Jammu & Kashmir	33	0	1	—	—
10	Karnataka	33	0	1	—	—

1
Dehradun63/100
Uttarakhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Karbi Anglong53/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Jashpur53/100
Chhattisgarh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Kanker53/100
Chhattisgarh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Surguja53/100
Chhattisgarh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Jabalpur53/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Kawardha37/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
40
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Kamrup33/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Hisar33/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Mandi33/100
Himachal Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Dehradun	63	0	15	—	—
2	Karbi Anglong	53	0	1	—	—
3	Jashpur	53	1	0	—	—
4	Kanker	53	1	0	—	—
5	Surguja	53	1	0	—	—
6	Jabalpur	53	0	1	—	—
7	Kawardha	37	0	2	—	—
8	Kamrup	33	0	1	—	—
9	Hisar	33	0	1	—	—
10	Mandi	33	0	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

1 wins
1 wins
1 wins

3 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

Bids won by MSE sellers50%

of 2 awarded bids with the MSE flag

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Fine Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 383: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor