Coarse Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 383: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Coarse Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 383 on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 26
- Closed in period
- 125
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- —
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 5 |
| Apr 2026 | 9 |
| May 2026 | 14 |
| Jun 2026 | 13 |
| Jul 2026 | 17 |
| Aug 2026 | 20 |
| Sept 2026 | 26 |
| Oct 2026 | 39 |
| Nov 2026 | 8 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 29%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 71%
- Reverse auction
- 2%
based on 140 bids
based on 14 bids
based on 133 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
26 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 97
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 65
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 59
- Momentum
- 11
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Filter Sand52/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 48
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6River Bed Sand41/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 14
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Tile Adhesive (V2)29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 14
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 14
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 14
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coarse Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 383 | 72 | 26 | 125 | — | — |
| 2 | Ordinary Portland Cement (V3) Confirming to IS 269 | 57 | 1 | 5 | — | — |
| 3 | Fine Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 383 | 52 | 0 | 18 | — | — |
| 4 | Filter Sand | 52 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Portland Pozzolana Cement (Calcined Clay Based) (V2) Conforming to IS 1489 (Part 2) | 42 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 6 | River Bed Sand | 41 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 7 | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving as per IS 15658 | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Tile Adhesive (V2) | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Steel Flat as per IS 2062 | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Ordinary Portland Cement (V3) Conforming to IS 269 for Bulk Buying | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 65
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 59
- Momentum
- 11
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Filter Sand100/100
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 48
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5River Bed Sand100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
26 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 97
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ordinary Portland Cement (V3) Confirming to IS 269 | 100 | 1 | 5 | — | — |
| 2 | Fine Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 383 | 100 | 0 | 18 | — | — |
| 3 | Filter Sand | 100 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Portland Pozzolana Cement (Calcined Clay Based) (V2) Conforming to IS 1489 (Part 2) | 100 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 5 | River Bed Sand | 100 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Coarse Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 383 | 97 | 26 | 125 | — | — |
- 1
24 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 77
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 96
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Department of Defence52/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 25
- Momentum
- 97
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 25
- Momentum
- 97
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 49
- Momentum
- 24
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 88
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 16
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 16
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Forest Department Chhattisgarh | 77 | 24 | 62 | — | — |
| 2 | Department of Defence | 52 | 0 | 16 | — | — |
| 3 | Department of Heavy Industry | 52 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat | 52 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of Military Affairs | 51 | 0 | 14 | — | — |
| 6 | Public Health Engineering Department Chhattisgarh | 50 | 1 | 7 | — | — |
| 7 | Revenue Department Andaman & Nicobar | 50 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (mcgm) | 50 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Department of Agriculture and Bio Technology | 45 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 10 | Central Armed Police Forces | 42 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 97
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Home Affairs45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Power45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 63 | 0 | 31 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises | 54 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Home Affairs | 45 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Power | 45 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs (mohua) | 35 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Chhattisgarh75/100
25 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 68
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 95
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Gujarat52/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 97
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Madhya Pradesh52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 97
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Uttarakhand51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 62
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Jharkhand50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 15
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Maharashtra50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 15
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Assam48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 52
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Manipur44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Delhi42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Himachal Pradesh42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chhattisgarh | 75 | 25 | 74 | — | — |
| 2 | Gujarat | 52 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Madhya Pradesh | 52 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Uttarakhand | 51 | 0 | 16 | — | — |
| 5 | Jharkhand | 50 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Maharashtra | 50 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Assam | 48 | 0 | 10 | — | — |
| 8 | Manipur | 44 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 9 | Delhi | 42 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 10 | Himachal Pradesh | 42 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1Raigarh77/100
Chhattisgarh ·5 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 73
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Raipur77/100
Chhattisgarh ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 88
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 86
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Bilaspur75/100
Chhattisgarh ·4 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 60
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Korba75/100
Chhattisgarh ·4 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 96
- Momentum
- 69
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Rajnandgaon71/100
Chhattisgarh ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 73
- Momentum
- 83
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Dhamtari69/100
Chhattisgarh ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 57
- Momentum
- 97
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Dehradun63/100
Uttarakhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Kawardha57/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 81
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Jashpur56/100
Chhattisgarh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 39
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 80
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Bijapur55/100
Chhattisgarh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 49
- Momentum
- 65
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 67
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raigarh | 77 | 5 | 11 | — | — |
| 2 | Raipur | 77 | 3 | 8 | — | — |
| 3 | Bilaspur | 75 | 4 | 12 | — | — |
| 4 | Korba | 75 | 4 | 10 | — | — |
| 5 | Rajnandgaon | 71 | 2 | 5 | — | — |
| 6 | Dhamtari | 69 | 2 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Dehradun | 63 | 0 | 16 | — | — |
| 8 | Kawardha | 57 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
| 9 | Jashpur | 56 | 1 | 4 | — | — |
| 10 | Bijapur | 55 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.