River Bed Sand: GeM business opportunity
Who buys River Bed Sand on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 1
- Closed in period
- 102
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- —
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 2 |
| Apr 2026 | 9 |
| May 2026 | 20 |
| Jun 2026 | 11 |
| Jul 2026 | 17 |
| Aug 2026 | 13 |
| Sept 2026 | 23 |
| Oct 2026 | 8 |
| Nov 2026 | 0 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 63%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 0%
- Reverse auction
- 1%
based on 103 bids
based on 1 bids
based on 103 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1River Bed Sand73/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2River Bed Sand (V2)49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 15
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 42
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | River Bed Sand | 73 | 1 | 102 | — | — |
| 2 | River Bed Sand (V2) | 49 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Ordinary Portland Cement (V3) Confirming to IS 269 | 45 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 4 | Coarse Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 383 | 41 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1River Bed Sand100/100
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 42
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | River Bed Sand | 100 | 1 | 102 | — | — |
| 2 | Ordinary Portland Cement (V3) Confirming to IS 269 | 100 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 3 | Coarse Aggregate (V2) Conforming to IS 383 | 100 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 55
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 57
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 57
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 18
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 42
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Coal India Limited43/100
Ministry of Coal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Forest Department Chhattisgarh | 73 | 0 | 47 | — | — |
| 2 | Prisons Administration and Reforms Department Uttar Pradesh | 50 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 3 | Public Health Engineering Department Chhattisgarh | 50 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 4 | Agriculture Department Uttar Pradesh | 50 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of Agriculture and Bio Technology | 48 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 6 | Department of Food and Public Distribution | 46 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 7 | Central Armed Police Forces | 45 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 8 | Department of Military Affairs | 43 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 9 | Coal India Limited | 43 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 10 | Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare) | 34 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Home Affairs63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 92
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 83
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Defence54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Ministry of Coal54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Ministry of Steel54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Pmo36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Home Affairs | 63 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution | 60 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare | 57 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Defence | 54 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Coal | 54 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Ministry of Steel | 54 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 7 | Ministry of Science and Technology | 36 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Pmo | 36 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Uttar Pradesh73/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 67
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Chhattisgarh71/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 42
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Jammu & Kashmir46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Puducherry46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Maharashtra44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Gujarat43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 34
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Jharkhand43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 34
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Delhi33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Assam30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Chandigarh30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uttar Pradesh | 73 | 1 | 14 | — | — |
| 2 | Chhattisgarh | 71 | 0 | 61 | — | — |
| 3 | Jammu & Kashmir | 46 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 4 | Puducherry | 46 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 5 | Maharashtra | 44 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 6 | Gujarat | 43 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 7 | Jharkhand | 43 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 8 | Delhi | 33 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Assam | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Chandigarh | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Korba63/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Bilaspur57/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 83
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Raigarh55/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 75
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Raipur55/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 75
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Kawardha54/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 70
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Hardoi54/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 70
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Karaikal52/100
Puducherry ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Bastar48/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Bijapur48/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Jashpur48/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Korba | 63 | 0 | 15 | — | — |
| 2 | Bilaspur | 57 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
| 3 | Raigarh | 55 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 4 | Raipur | 55 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 5 | Kawardha | 54 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 6 | Hardoi | 54 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 7 | Karaikal | 52 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 8 | Bastar | 48 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 9 | Bijapur | 48 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 10 | Jashpur | 48 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.