Acetic Acid (ONGC): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Acetic Acid (ONGC) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 0
- Closed in period
- 8
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- —
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 0 |
| May 2026 | 2 |
| Jun 2026 | 0 |
| Jul 2026 | 0 |
| Aug 2026 | 1 |
| Sept 2026 | 5 |
| Oct 2026 | 0 |
| Nov 2026 | 0 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 100%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- —
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 8 bids
based on 0 bids
based on 8 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Acetic Acid (ONGC)73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ethyl Acetate50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Hexane44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ammonium acetate44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Glycine44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Ammonia solution 25%44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Ammonium Sulphate44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Ceric Ammonium Nitrate44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Perchloric acid44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Potassium Bromate44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Acetic Acid (ONGC) | 73 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 2 | Ethyl Acetate | 50 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Hexane | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Ammonium acetate | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Glycine | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Ammonia solution 25% | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Ammonium Sulphate | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Ceric Ammonium Nitrate | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Perchloric acid | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Potassium Bromate | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Acetic Acid (ONGC)100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Acetic Acid (ONGC) | 100 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
- 1
Ministry of Education ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Hindustan Copper Limited54/100
Ministry of Mines ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Department of Space54/100
Department of Space ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Higher Education | 65 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 2 | Hindustan Copper Limited | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Department of Space | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Animal Husbandry Dairy Development and Fisheries Department Maharashtra | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Education65/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Textiles54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Mines54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Department of Space54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Education | 65 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas | 65 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Textiles | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Mines | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of Space | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Delhi65/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Rajasthan65/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Andhra Pradesh54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Madhya Pradesh54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Maharashtra54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6West Bengal54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Delhi | 65 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 2 | Rajasthan | 65 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Andhra Pradesh | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Madhya Pradesh | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Maharashtra | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | West Bengal | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1South Delhi65/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Barmer65/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Nellore54/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Balaghat54/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Parbhani54/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Murshidabad54/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | South Delhi | 65 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 2 | Barmer | 65 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Nellore | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Balaghat | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Parbhani | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Murshidabad | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.