Glycine: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Glycine on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 0Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 0
Closed in period: 20
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

0 Mar 2026

0 Apr 2026

3 May 2026

1 Jun 2026

88 Jul 2026

2 Aug 2026

6 Sept 2026

0 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	0
Apr 2026	0
May 2026	3
Jun 2026	1
Jul 2026	8
Aug 2026	2
Sept 2026	6
Oct 2026	0
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 80%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: —
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Glycine73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
L-Ascorbic Acid56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
46
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Hexane46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Petroleum ether46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ethyl Acetate46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Methyl Red46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
AMPICILLIN46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Bromophenol Blue42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
23
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ammonium acetate42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
23
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ammonium molybdate42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
23
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Glycine	73	20	—	—
2	L-Ascorbic Acid	56	3	—	—
3	Hexane	46	2	—	—
4	Petroleum ether	46	2	—	—
5	Ethyl Acetate	46	2	—	—
6	Methyl Red	46	2	—	—
7	AMPICILLIN	46	2	—	—
8	Bromophenol Blue	42	1	—	—
9	Ammonium acetate	42	1	—	—
10	Ammonium molybdate	42	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Glycine100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
L-Ascorbic Acid100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
46
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Glycine	100	0	20	—	—
2	L-Ascorbic Acid	100	0	3	—	—

1
Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare)73/100
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Fertilizers73/100
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Defence Research & Development59/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Biotechnology (dbt)59/100
Ministry of Science and Technology ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Higher Education50/100
Ministry of Education ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Department of Science and Technology (dst)50/100
Ministry of Science and Technology ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Atomic Energy50/100
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of Space50/100
Department of Space ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Higher Education Department Uttar Pradesh50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare)	73	3	—	—
2	Department of Fertilizers	73	3	—	—
3	Department of Defence Research & Development	59	2	—	—
4	Department of Biotechnology (dbt)	59	2	—	—
5	Department of Higher Education	50	1	—	—
6	Department of Science and Technology (dst)	50	1	—	—
7	Department of Atomic Energy	50	1	—	—
8	Department of Space	50	1	—	—
9	Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh	50	1	—	—
10	Higher Education Department Uttar Pradesh	50	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Science and Technology73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Defence59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Textiles59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Education50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Pmo50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of Space50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare	73	3	—	—
2	Ministry of Science and Technology	73	3	—	—
3	Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers	73	3	—	—
4	Ministry of Defence	59	2	—	—
5	Ministry of Textiles	59	2	—	—
6	Ministry of Education	50	1	—	—
7	Pmo	50	1	—	—
8	Department of Space	50	1	—	—

1
Kerala73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Delhi66/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Maharashtra66/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Uttar Pradesh66/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Assam53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
West Bengal53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Chandigarh47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Madhya Pradesh47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Kerala	73	5	—	—
2	Delhi	66	3	—	—
3	Maharashtra	66	3	—	—
4	Uttar Pradesh	66	3	—	—
5	Assam	53	2	—	—
6	West Bengal	53	2	—	—
7	Chandigarh	47	1	—	—
8	Madhya Pradesh	47	1	—	—

1
Thiruvananthapuram73/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Kamrup55/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
North Delhi55/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Mumbai55/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Murshidabad55/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Chandigarh48/100
Chandigarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
South Delhi48/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ernakulam48/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Guna48/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Raigad48/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Thiruvananthapuram	73	4	—	—
2	Kamrup	55	2	—	—
3	North Delhi	55	2	—	—
4	Mumbai	55	2	—	—
5	Murshidabad	55	2	—	—
6	Chandigarh	48	1	—	—
7	South Delhi	48	1	—	—
8	Ernakulam	48	1	—	—
9	Guna	48	1	—	—
10	Raigad	48	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Glycine: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor