X ray baggage inspection system as per MHA QR (V3): GeM business opportunity

Who buys X ray baggage inspection system as per MHA QR (V3) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 8Awarded results: 1Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 8
Closed in period: 110
Awarded results: 1
Median winning price (L1): ₹49 lakh
Avg bidders per bid: 4

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

1 Feb 2026

5 Mar 2026

13 Apr 2026

16 May 2026

17 Jun 2026

16 Jul 2026

13 Aug 2026

1818 Sept 2026

15 Oct 2026

4 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	1
Mar 2026	5
Apr 2026	13
May 2026	16
Jun 2026	17
Jul 2026	16
Aug 2026	13
Sept 2026	18
Oct 2026	15
Nov 2026	4

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 15%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 43%
Reverse auction: 6%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
X ray baggage inspection system as per MHA QR (V3)72/100
8 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹49 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
96
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Door Frame Metal Detector41/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
29
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	X ray baggage inspection system as per MHA QR (V3)	72	8	110	4	₹49 lakh
2	Door Frame Metal Detector	41	0	3	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Door Frame Metal Detector100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
29
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
X ray baggage inspection system as per MHA QR (V3)96/100
8 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹49 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
96
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Door Frame Metal Detector	100	0	3	—	—
2	X ray baggage inspection system as per MHA QR (V3)	96	8	110	4	₹49 lakh

1
Department of Military Affairs73/100
Ministry of Defence ·3 live · 7 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
55
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
97
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Revenue64/100
Ministry of Finance ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
37
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Defence Research & Development59/100
Ministry of Defence ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
59
Momentum
46
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh Affairs59/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
37
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
67
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Indian Railways54/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
71
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Gail India Limited46/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Space46/100
Department of Space ·0 live · 1 bidders avg · L1 ₹49 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of Financial Services44/100
Ministry of Finance ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
37
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Central Police Organisation44/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
37
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Prisons Administration and Reforms Department Uttar Pradesh44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
37
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	73	3	37	7	—
2	Department of Revenue	64	1	2	—	—
3	Department of Defence Research & Development	59	1	7	—	—
4	Department of Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh Affairs	59	1	2	—	—
5	Indian Railways	54	0	13	—	—
6	Gail India Limited	46	0	4	—	—
7	Department of Space	46	0	4	1	₹49 lakh
8	Department of Financial Services	44	0	3	—	—
9	Central Police Organisation	44	0	3	—	—
10	Prisons Administration and Reforms Department Uttar Pradesh	44	0	3	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence72/100
4 live · 7 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
98
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Finance59/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
49
Momentum
61
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Home Affairs57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
52
Momentum
53
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
86
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Power53/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Railways52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
66
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
45
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Space45/100
0 live · 1 bidders avg · L1 ₹49 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
41
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Communications33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs (mohua)33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	72	4	48	7	—
2	Ministry of Finance	59	1	5	—	—
3	Ministry of Home Affairs	57	1	6	—	—
4	Ministry of Power	53	1	1	—	—
5	Ministry of Railways	52	0	13	—	—
6	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	46	0	5	—	—
7	Department of Space	45	0	4	1	₹49 lakh
8	Ministry of Communications	33	0	2	—	—
9	Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs (mohua)	33	0	2	—	—
10	Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways	33	0	2	—	—

1
Delhi80/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Karnataka77/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
80
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Jammu & Kashmir73/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum
92
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
75
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Maharashtra69/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
39
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
95
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Madhya Pradesh66/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
46
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Assam64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
69
Momentum
53
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Uttar Pradesh55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Punjab53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
69
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Kerala52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
West Bengal49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Delhi	80	3	11	—	—
2	Karnataka	77	1	9	—	—
3	Jammu & Kashmir	73	3	9	—	—
4	Maharashtra	69	1	18	—	—
5	Madhya Pradesh	66	0	3	—	—
6	Assam	64	0	7	—	—
7	Uttar Pradesh	55	0	8	—	—
8	Punjab	53	0	7	—	—
9	Kerala	52	0	6	—	—
10	West Bengal	49	0	4	—	—

1
Bangalore83/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
West Delhi80/100
Delhi ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
92
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
South West Delhi76/100
Delhi ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
92
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Pune74/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
71
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Mumbai72/100
Maharashtra ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
61
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
83
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Jammu72/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
92
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
75
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Central Delhi57/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ernakulam57/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Chandigarh54/100
Chandigarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
71
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Jalgaon54/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
71
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Bangalore	83	0	6	—	—
2	West Delhi	80	2	3	—	—
3	South West Delhi	76	1	3	—	—
4	Pune	74	0	3	—	—
5	Mumbai	72	1	5	—	—
6	Jammu	72	1	3	—	—
7	Central Delhi	57	0	4	—	—
8	Ernakulam	57	0	4	—	—
9	Chandigarh	54	0	3	—	—
10	Jalgaon	54	0	3	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

1 wins

1 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

Bids won by MSE sellers0%

of 1 awarded bids with the MSE flag

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

X ray baggage inspection system as per MHA QR (V3): GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor