Winter Jacket (V2): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Winter Jacket (V2) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 3
- Closed in period
- 27
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- —
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 0 |
| May 2026 | 0 |
| Jun 2026 | 2 |
| Jul 2026 | 7 |
| Aug 2026 | 3 |
| Sept 2026 | 7 |
| Oct 2026 | 8 |
| Nov 2026 | 3 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 37%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 100%
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 27 bids
based on 1 bids
based on 26 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Winter Jacket (V2)73/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Winter Jacket66/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 95
- Momentum
- 27
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Winter Jacket (V2) | 73 | 3 | 27 | — | — |
| 2 | Winter Jacket | 66 | 0 | 25 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Winter Jacket (V2)100/100
3 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Winter Jacket100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 95
- Momentum
- 27
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Winter Jacket (V2) | 100 | 3 | 27 | — | — |
| 2 | Winter Jacket | 100 | 0 | 25 | — | — |
- 1Indian Railways71/100
Ministry of Railways ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 42
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 49
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 49
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Women Safety Division32/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
Ministry of Civil Aviation ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Indian Railways | 71 | 2 | 14 | — | — |
| 2 | Revenue Registration and Land Reforms Department Jharkhand | 67 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Women Child Development & Social Security Department Jharkhand | 60 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Department of Military Affairs | 52 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Health & Family Welfare Department Gujarat | 37 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Revenue Department Rajasthan | 37 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Women Safety Division | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Aai Cargo Logistics and Allied Services Co Ltd | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Energy Department Madhya Pradesh | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Railways71/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 42
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Defence52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Home Affairs32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Railways | 71 | 2 | 14 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Defence | 52 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Home Affairs | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Civil Aviation | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Jharkhand79/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 83
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Maharashtra63/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 73
- Momentum
- 42
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Delhi57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 83
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Uttar Pradesh57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 83
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5West Bengal57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 83
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Karnataka54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Madhya Pradesh51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Rajasthan51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Gujarat40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Telangana40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jharkhand | 79 | 1 | 7 | — | — |
| 2 | Maharashtra | 63 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Delhi | 57 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Uttar Pradesh | 57 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | West Bengal | 57 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Karnataka | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Madhya Pradesh | 51 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 8 | Rajasthan | 51 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 9 | Gujarat | 40 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Telangana | 40 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Chatra78/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Jalgaon71/100
Maharashtra ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 42
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Jaipur58/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4West Delhi58/100
Delhi ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Bokaro58/100
Jharkhand ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Dhanbad58/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Chandauli58/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Darjeeling58/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Ahmedabad45/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Bhopal45/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chatra | 78 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 2 | Jalgaon | 71 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Jaipur | 58 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | West Delhi | 58 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 5 | Bokaro | 58 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 6 | Dhanbad | 58 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Chandauli | 58 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Darjeeling | 58 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Ahmedabad | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Bhopal | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.