Water Quality Meters / Analyzers: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Water Quality Meters / Analyzers on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 2Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 2
Closed in period: 43
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

1 Mar 2026

4 Apr 2026

4 May 2026

6 Jun 2026

1010 Jul 2026

6 Aug 2026

8 Sept 2026

5 Oct 2026

1 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	1
Apr 2026	4
May 2026	4
Jun 2026	6
Jul 2026	10
Aug 2026	6
Sept 2026	8
Oct 2026	5
Nov 2026	1

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 96%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 0%
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Water Quality Meters / Analyzers73/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Potable Water Purification System DE - Ionization Based30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
18
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Water Quality Meters / Analyzers	73	2	43	—	—
2	Potable Water Purification System DE - Ionization Based	30	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Water Quality Meters / Analyzers100/100
2 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Water Quality Meters / Analyzers	100	2	43	—	—

1
Department of Atomic Energy76/100
Pmo ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Forest Department Chhattisgarh71/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare)53/100
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Indian Railways51/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Department of Water Resources River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation51/100
Ministry of Jal Shakti ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Panchayati Raj51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Industrial Training Institute39/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Panchayati Raj Department Odisha39/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs34/100
Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs (mohua) ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Atomic Energy	76	1	4	—	—
2	Forest Department Chhattisgarh	71	0	3	—	—
3	Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat	63	0	9	—	—
4	Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare)	53	0	4	—	—
5	Indian Railways	51	0	3	—	—
6	Department of Water Resources River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation	51	0	3	—	—
7	Department of Panchayati Raj	51	0	3	—	—
8	Industrial Training Institute	39	0	2	—	—
9	Panchayati Raj Department Odisha	39	0	2	—	—
10	Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs	34	0	1	—	—

1
Pmo83/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Labour and Employment57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Railways56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Jal Shakti56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs (mohua)37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Coal37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Mines37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Pmo	83	1	4	—	—
2	Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare	63	0	5	—	—
3	Ministry of Labour and Employment	57	1	0	—	—
4	Ministry of Railways	56	0	3	—	—
5	Ministry of Jal Shakti	56	0	3	—	—
6	Ministry of Health and Family Welfare	37	0	1	—	—
7	Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs (mohua)	37	0	1	—	—
8	Ministry of Coal	37	0	1	—	—
9	Ministry of Mines	37	0	1	—	—

1
Maharashtra77/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
93
Momentum
83
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Chhattisgarh76/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Gujarat63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Odisha54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Karnataka53/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Haryana38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Uttarakhand38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
West Bengal38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Bihar33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Delhi33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Maharashtra	77	1	8	—	—
2	Chhattisgarh	76	0	6	—	—
3	Gujarat	63	0	11	—	—
4	Odisha	54	0	5	—	—
5	Karnataka	53	1	0	—	—
6	Haryana	38	0	2	—	—
7	Uttarakhand	38	0	2	—	—
8	West Bengal	38	0	2	—	—
9	Bihar	33	0	1	—	—
10	Delhi	33	0	1	—	—

1
Korba73/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Jamnagar63/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Khordha58/100
Odisha ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Uttara Kannada55/100
Karnataka ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Pune55/100
Maharashtra ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Kolhapur53/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Mumbai53/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Raipur41/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Porbandar41/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Bardhaman41/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Korba	73	0	3	—	—
2	Jamnagar	63	0	7	—	—
3	Khordha	58	0	5	—	—
4	Uttara Kannada	55	1	0	—	—
5	Pune	55	1	0	—	—
6	Kolhapur	53	0	3	—	—
7	Mumbai	53	0	3	—	—
8	Raipur	41	0	2	—	—
9	Porbandar	41	0	2	—	—
10	Bardhaman	41	0	2	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Water Quality Meters / Analyzers: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor