Warehousing Service - Per MT - Monthly Basis: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Warehousing Service - Per MT - Monthly Basis on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 158Awarded results: 1Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 158
Closed in period: 1,020
Awarded results: 1
Median winning price (L1): ₹1.2 crore
Avg bidders per bid: 5

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

20 Feb 2026

44 Mar 2026

170 Apr 2026

72 May 2026

168 Jun 2026

214214 Jul 2026

186 Aug 2026

117 Sept 2026

158 Oct 2026

29 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	20
Mar 2026	44
Apr 2026	170
May 2026	72
Jun 2026	168
Jul 2026	214
Aug 2026	186
Sept 2026	117
Oct 2026	158
Nov 2026	29

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 60%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 24%
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Warehousing Service - Per MT - Monthly Basis73/100
158 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.2 crore
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Goods Transport Services - Per MT28/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
10
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Leasing in of Commercial Properties28/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
10
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Warehousing Service - Per MT - Monthly Basis	73	158	1,020	5	₹1.2 crore
2	Goods Transport Services - Per MT	28	0	1	—	—
3	Leasing in of Commercial Properties	28	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Warehousing Service - Per MT - Monthly Basis100/100
158 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.2 crore · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Warehousing Service - Per MT - Monthly Basis	100	158	1,020	5	₹1.2 crore

1
Department of Food and Public Distribution73/100
Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution ·105 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
53
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Agriculture Department Haryana69/100
32 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Agriculture Department Punjab66/100
16 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
64
Momentum
71
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Food Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Department Punjab59/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
85
Momentum
7
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Co-operative Department Punjab46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
47
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Indian Oil Corporation Limited30/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
17
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd30/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
17
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Food and Public Distribution	73	105	661	—	—
2	Agriculture Department Haryana	69	32	3	—	—
3	Agriculture Department Punjab	66	16	52	—	—
4	Food Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Department Punjab	59	4	277	—	—
5	Co-operative Department Punjab	46	0	21	—	—
6	Indian Oil Corporation Limited	30	0	2	—	—
7	Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd	30	0	2	—	—

1
Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution73/100
105 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
53
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Culture48/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
10
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas41/100
0 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.2 crore
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
29
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution	73	105	661	—	—
2	Ministry of Culture	48	1	0	—	—
3	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	41	0	6	5	₹1.2 crore

1
Haryana75/100
34 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
76
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Odisha74/100
27 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Jharkhand74/100
25 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
71
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Karnataka69/100
28 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
55
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Chandigarh68/100
26 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
27
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Meghalaya66/100
5 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
45
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Tripura65/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Telangana63/100
7 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
61
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Gujarat56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
76
Momentum
3
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Uttar Pradesh54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
5
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Haryana	75	34	67	—	—
2	Odisha	74	27	52	—	—
3	Jharkhand	74	25	53	—	—
4	Karnataka	69	28	0	—	—
5	Chandigarh	68	26	428	—	—
6	Meghalaya	66	5	10	—	—
7	Tripura	65	4	8	—	—
8	Telangana	63	7	32	—	—
9	Gujarat	56	0	105	—	—
10	Uttar Pradesh	54	0	71	—	—

1
Panchkula75/100
Haryana ·29 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
75
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Khordha74/100
Odisha ·22 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ranchi69/100
Jharkhand ·16 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
69
Momentum
79
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Chandigarh68/100
Chandigarh ·26 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
27
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Bangalore68/100
Karnataka ·22 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
West Tripura65/100
Tripura ·4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ahmedabad56/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
76
Momentum
3
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
East Khasi Hills56/100
Meghalaya ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
57
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Karim Nagar55/100
Telangana ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
29
Momentum
68
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Lucknow54/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
5
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Panchkula	75	29	67	—	—
2	Khordha	74	22	51	—	—
3	Ranchi	69	16	53	—	—
4	Chandigarh	68	26	428	—	—
5	Bangalore	68	22	0	—	—
6	West Tripura	65	4	8	—	—
7	Ahmedabad	56	0	105	—	—
8	East Khasi Hills	56	2	10	—	—
9	Karim Nagar	55	1	4	—	—
10	Lucknow	54	0	71	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

1 wins

1 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Warehousing Service - Per MT - Monthly Basis: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor