Leasing in of Commercial Properties: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Leasing in of Commercial Properties on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 31Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 31
Closed in period: 276
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

3 Feb 2026

25 Mar 2026

26 Apr 2026

45 May 2026

43 Jun 2026

24 Jul 2026

6161 Aug 2026

40 Sept 2026

28 Oct 2026

12 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	3
Mar 2026	25
Apr 2026	26
May 2026	45
Jun 2026	43
Jul 2026	24
Aug 2026	61
Sept 2026	40
Oct 2026	28
Nov 2026	12

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 51%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 79%
Reverse auction: 3%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Leasing in of Commercial Properties72/100
31 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Warehousing Service - Per MT - Annual Basis29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
12
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Warehousing Service - Per MT - Monthly Basis29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
12
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Leasing in of Commercial Properties	72	31	276	—	—
2	Warehousing Service - Per MT - Annual Basis	29	0	1	—	—
3	Warehousing Service - Per MT - Monthly Basis	29	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Leasing in of Commercial Properties100/100
31 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Leasing in of Commercial Properties	100	31	276	—	—

1
Employees State Insuarnce Corporation69/100
Ministry of Labour and Employment ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
31
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Food and Public Distribution69/100
Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
National Highways Authority of India64/100
Ministry of Road Transports and Highways ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
90
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Revenue60/100
Ministry of Finance ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
20
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Financial Services58/100
Ministry of Finance ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
34
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
67
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Department of Sports50/100
Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
17
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Telecommunications (dot)50/100
Ministry of Communications ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
17
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Public Health and Family Welfare Department Maharashtra46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Skill Development and Technical Education Department. Odisha43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
34
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd33/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Employees State Insuarnce Corporation	69	3	55	—	—
2	Department of Food and Public Distribution	69	1	8	—	—
3	National Highways Authority of India	64	1	4	—	—
4	Department of Revenue	60	3	20	—	—
5	Department of Financial Services	58	1	2	—	—
6	Department of Sports	50	1	0	—	—
7	Department of Telecommunications (dot)	50	1	0	—	—
8	Public Health and Family Welfare Department Maharashtra	46	0	5	—	—
9	Skill Development and Technical Education Department. Odisha	43	0	3	—	—
10	Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd	33	0	2	—	—

1
Ministry of Labour and Employment72/100
21 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
45
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Road Transports and Highways67/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution64/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
90
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Finance57/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
35
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
96
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports49/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
13
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Communications49/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
13
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Education31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
13
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ministry of Civil Aviation29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
13
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Labour and Employment	72	21	219	—	—
2	Ministry of Road Transports and Highways	67	3	10	—	—
3	Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution	64	1	9	—	—
4	Ministry of Finance	57	4	22	—	—
5	Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports	49	1	0	—	—
6	Ministry of Communications	49	1	0	—	—
7	Ministry of Education	31	0	2	—	—
8	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	31	0	2	—	—
9	Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises	29	0	1	—	—
10	Ministry of Civil Aviation	29	0	1	—	—

1
Chhattisgarh69/100
7 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
59
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
91
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Kerala68/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
71
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Telangana68/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
52
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Gujarat67/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
21
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Haryana67/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
54
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Tamil Nadu66/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
80
Momentum
48
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Delhi65/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Rajasthan64/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
69
Momentum
53
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Assam63/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
90
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Odisha63/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
90
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Chhattisgarh	69	7	4	—	—
2	Kerala	68	2	17	—	—
3	Telangana	68	4	4	—	—
4	Gujarat	67	1	64	—	—
5	Haryana	67	2	23	—	—
6	Tamil Nadu	66	2	26	—	—
7	Delhi	65	2	3	—	—
8	Rajasthan	64	2	15	—	—
9	Assam	63	1	4	—	—
10	Odisha	63	1	4	—	—

1
Raipur72/100
Chhattisgarh ·6 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
90
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Hyderabad72/100
Telangana ·4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
64
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ahmedabad69/100
Gujarat ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
30
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Madurai67/100
Tamil Nadu ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
47
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Salem67/100
Tamil Nadu ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
47
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Nagaon66/100
Assam ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
52
Momentum
90
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Jaipur66/100
Rajasthan ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
52
Momentum
90
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Rohtak65/100
Haryana ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
57
Momentum
75
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Udaipur65/100
Rajasthan ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
57
Momentum
75
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
South Delhi65/100
Delhi ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
40
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Raipur	72	6	4	—	—
2	Hyderabad	72	4	4	—	—
3	Ahmedabad	69	1	29	—	—
4	Madurai	67	1	3	—	—
5	Salem	67	1	3	—	—
6	Nagaon	66	1	4	—	—
7	Jaipur	66	1	4	—	—
8	Rohtak	65	1	5	—	—
9	Udaipur	65	1	5	—	—
10	South Delhi	65	1	2	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Leasing in of Commercial Properties: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor