Warehousing Service- Lumpsum quote based: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Warehousing Service- Lumpsum quote based on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 14Awarded results: 1Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 14
Closed in period: 235
Awarded results: 1
Median winning price (L1): ₹3.7 crore
Avg bidders per bid: 3

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

30 Mar 2026

6262 Apr 2026

16 May 2026

35 Jun 2026

30 Jul 2026

15 Aug 2026

47 Sept 2026

9 Oct 2026

5 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	30
Apr 2026	62
May 2026	16
Jun 2026	35
Jul 2026	30
Aug 2026	15
Sept 2026	47
Oct 2026	9
Nov 2026	5

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 15%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 0%
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Warehousing Service- Lumpsum quote based73/100
14 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹3.7 crore
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Warehousing Service- Lumpsum quote based	73	14	235	3	₹3.7 crore

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Warehousing Service- Lumpsum quote based100/100
14 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹3.7 crore · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Warehousing Service- Lumpsum quote based	100	14	235	3	₹3.7 crore

1
Department of Food and Public Distribution73/100
Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution ·14 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
52
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Indian Oil Corporation Limited41/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹3.7 crore
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
29
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Fertilizers31/100
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Gail India Limited31/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd29/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
13
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Materials29/100
Ministry of Mines ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
13
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Food and Public Distribution	73	14	224	—	—
2	Indian Oil Corporation Limited	41	0	4	3	₹3.7 crore
3	Department of Fertilizers	31	0	2	—	—
4	Gail India Limited	31	0	2	—	—
5	Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd	29	0	1	—	—
6	Materials	29	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution73/100
14 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
52
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas45/100
0 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹3.7 crore
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
40
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Mines29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
13
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution	73	14	224	—	—
2	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	45	0	8	3	₹3.7 crore
3	Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers	31	0	2	—	—
4	Ministry of Mines	29	0	1	—	—

1
Manipur77/100
8 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
82
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Arunachal Pradesh74/100
5 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
58
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Uttarakhand64/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
37
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Tamil Nadu59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
88
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Maharashtra57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
82
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
West Bengal53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Nagaland51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
62
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Meghalaya49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
55
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Delhi45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
41
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Telangana33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Manipur	77	8	26	—	—
2	Arunachal Pradesh	74	5	72	—	—
3	Uttarakhand	64	1	3	—	—
4	Tamil Nadu	59	0	46	—	—
5	Maharashtra	57	0	34	—	—
6	West Bengal	53	0	18	—	—
7	Nagaland	51	0	14	—	—
8	Meghalaya	49	0	10	—	—
9	Delhi	45	0	5	—	—
10	Telangana	33	0	2	—	—

1
Imphal West77/100
Manipur ·8 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
82
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Papum Pare74/100
Arunachal Pradesh ·5 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
58
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Dehradun64/100
Uttarakhand ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
37
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Chennai59/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
88
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Mumbai57/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
82
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
North 24 Parganas53/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Dimapur51/100
Nagaland ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
62
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
East Khasi Hills49/100
Meghalaya ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
55
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Central Delhi42/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
East Delhi33/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Imphal West	77	8	26	—	—
2	Papum Pare	74	5	72	—	—
3	Dehradun	64	1	3	—	—
4	Chennai	59	0	46	—	—
5	Mumbai	57	0	34	—	—
6	North 24 Parganas	53	0	18	—	—
7	Dimapur	51	0	14	—	—
8	East Khasi Hills	49	0	10	—	—
9	Central Delhi	42	0	3	—	—
10	East Delhi	33	0	2	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

1 wins

1 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

Bids won by MSE sellers0%

of 1 awarded bids with the MSE flag

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Warehousing Service- Lumpsum quote based: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor