Vacuum Contactor Conforming To IS/IEC 60470: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Vacuum Contactor Conforming To IS/IEC 60470 on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 0Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 0
Closed in period: 20
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

1 Mar 2026

4 Apr 2026

4 May 2026

2 Jun 2026

0 Jul 2026

2 Aug 2026

66 Sept 2026

1 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	1
Apr 2026	4
May 2026	4
Jun 2026	2
Jul 2026	0
Aug 2026	2
Sept 2026	6
Oct 2026	1
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 85%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: —
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Vacuum Contactor Conforming To IS/IEC 6047073/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Air Break Contactors32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
23
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Vacuum Contactor Conforming To IS/IEC 60470	73	0	20	—	—
2	Air Break Contactors	32	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Vacuum Contactor Conforming To IS/IEC 60470100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Vacuum Contactor Conforming To IS/IEC 60470	100	0	20	—	—

1
Coal India Limited63/100
Ministry of Coal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Energy Department Uttar Pradesh63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Steel Authority of India Limited58/100
Ministry of Steel ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Military Affairs58/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Atomic Energy45/100
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Department of Fertilizers38/100
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Bhakra Beas Managemet Board38/100
Ministry of Power ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Hindustan Copper Limited38/100
Ministry of Mines ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Dr. Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited38/100
Ministry of Steel ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Coal India Limited	63	4	—	—
2	Energy Department Uttar Pradesh	63	4	—	—
3	Steel Authority of India Limited	58	3	—	—
4	Department of Military Affairs	58	1	—	—
5	Department of Atomic Energy	45	2	—	—
6	Department of Fertilizers	38	1	—	—
7	Bhakra Beas Managemet Board	38	1	—	—
8	Hindustan Copper Limited	38	1	—	—
9	Dr. Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry	38	1	—	—
10	Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited	38	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Coal63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Steel63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Defence58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Pmo45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Power38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Mines38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Coal	63	4	—	—
2	Ministry of Steel	63	4	—	—
3	Ministry of Defence	58	1	—	—
4	Pmo	45	2	—	—
5	Ministry of Power	38	1	—	—
6	Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers	38	1	—	—
7	Ministry of Mines	38	1	—	—

1
Uttar Pradesh63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Delhi57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Jharkhand56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Rajasthan43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
West Bengal43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Andhra Pradesh37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Chandigarh37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Chhattisgarh37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Jammu & Kashmir37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Maharashtra37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Uttar Pradesh	63	5	—	—
2	Delhi	57	1	—	—
3	Jharkhand	56	3	—	—
4	Rajasthan	43	2	—	—
5	West Bengal	43	2	—	—
6	Andhra Pradesh	37	1	—	—
7	Chandigarh	37	1	—	—
8	Chhattisgarh	37	1	—	—
9	Jammu & Kashmir	37	1	—	—
10	Maharashtra	37	1	—	—

1
Mathura63/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
South West Delhi60/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Dhanbad49/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Bardhaman49/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Visakhapatnam40/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Chandigarh40/100
Chandigarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Korba40/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ananthnag40/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
West Singhbhum40/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Chandrapur40/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Mathura	63	3	—	—
2	South West Delhi	60	1	—	—
3	Dhanbad	49	2	—	—
4	Bardhaman	49	2	—	—
5	Visakhapatnam	40	1	—	—
6	Chandigarh	40	1	—	—
7	Korba	40	1	—	—
8	Ananthnag	40	1	—	—
9	West Singhbhum	40	1	—	—
10	Chandrapur	40	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Vacuum Contactor Conforming To IS/IEC 60470: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor