Ultrasonic pulse velocity tester: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Ultrasonic pulse velocity tester on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 0Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 0
Closed in period: 18
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

1 Mar 2026

3 Apr 2026

2 May 2026

0 Jun 2026

2 Jul 2026

55 Aug 2026

2 Sept 2026

3 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	1
Apr 2026	3
May 2026	2
Jun 2026	0
Jul 2026	2
Aug 2026	5
Sept 2026	2
Oct 2026	3
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 77%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: —
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Ultrasonic pulse velocity tester73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ultrasonic Sensor32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ultrasonic pulse velocity tester	73	0	18	—	—
2	Ultrasonic Sensor	32	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Ultrasonic pulse velocity tester100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ultrasonic pulse velocity tester	100	0	18	—	—

1
Education Department Gujarat65/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Military Affairs63/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Higher Education41/100
Ministry of Education ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Heavy Industry35/100
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Power Grid Corporation of India Limited35/100
Ministry of Power ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Steel Authority of India Limited35/100
Ministry of Steel ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Atomic Energy35/100
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Patratu Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited35/100
Ministry of Power ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Sugar Factories Federation Limited35/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Education Department Gujarat	65	3	—	—
2	Department of Military Affairs	63	7	—	—
3	Department of Higher Education	41	2	—	—
4	Department of Heavy Industry	35	1	—	—
5	Power Grid Corporation of India Limited	35	1	—	—
6	Steel Authority of India Limited	35	1	—	—
7	Department of Atomic Energy	35	1	—	—
8	Patratu Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited	35	1	—	—
9	Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Sugar Factories Federation Limited	35	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Education41/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Power41/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises35/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Pmo35/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Steel35/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	63	7	—	—
2	Ministry of Education	41	2	—	—
3	Ministry of Power	41	2	—	—
4	Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises	35	1	—	—
5	Pmo	35	1	—	—
6	Ministry of Steel	35	1	—	—

1
Gujarat79/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Maharashtra63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Odisha43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
West Bengal43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Jharkhand37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Karnataka37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Meghalaya37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Rajasthan37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Uttar Pradesh37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Gujarat	79	4	—	—
2	Maharashtra	63	5	—	—
3	Odisha	43	2	—	—
4	West Bengal	43	2	—	—
5	Jharkhand	37	1	—	—
6	Karnataka	37	1	—	—
7	Meghalaya	37	1	—	—
8	Rajasthan	37	1	—	—
9	Uttar Pradesh	37	1	—	—

1
Dahod68/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Mumbai63/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Sundergarh43/100
Odisha ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Jamnagar37/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Hazaribag37/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Bangalore37/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
East Khasi Hills37/100
Meghalaya ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Bikaner37/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Farrukhabad37/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Jalpaiguri37/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Dahod	68	3	—	—
2	Mumbai	63	5	—	—
3	Sundergarh	43	2	—	—
4	Jamnagar	37	1	—	—
5	Hazaribag	37	1	—	—
6	Bangalore	37	1	—	—
7	East Khasi Hills	37	1	—	—
8	Bikaner	37	1	—	—
9	Farrukhabad	37	1	—	—
10	Jalpaiguri	37	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Ultrasonic pulse velocity tester: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor