True RMS Clamp Meter (V2): GeM business opportunity

Who buys True RMS Clamp Meter (V2) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 6Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 6
Closed in period: 8
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: 1

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

0 Mar 2026

0 Apr 2026

0 May 2026

0 Jun 2026

0 Jul 2026

0 Aug 2026

2 Sept 2026

88 Oct 2026

4 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	0
Apr 2026	0
May 2026	0
Jun 2026	0
Jul 2026	0
Aug 2026	0
Sept 2026	2
Oct 2026	8
Nov 2026	4

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 100%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 0%
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
True RMS Clamp Meter (V2)73/100
6 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
true rms clamp meter57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
66
Momentum
25
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	True RMS Clamp Meter (V2)	73	6	8	1	—
2	true rms clamp meter	57	0	5	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
True RMS Clamp Meter (V2)100/100
6 live · 1 bidders avg · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
true rms clamp meter100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
66
Momentum
25
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	True RMS Clamp Meter (V2)	100	6	8	1	—
2	true rms clamp meter	100	0	5	—	—

1
Indian Railways74/100
Ministry of Railways ·3 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
56
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Power Department Delhi47/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Heavy Industry47/100
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Indian Oil Corporation Limited47/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Defence Production47/100
Ministry of Defence ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Labour and Employment Department Gujarat40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Indian Railways	74	3	5	1	—
2	Power Department Delhi	47	1	0	—	—
3	Department of Heavy Industry	47	0	1	—	—
4	Indian Oil Corporation Limited	47	1	0	—	—
5	Department of Defence Production	47	1	0	—	—
6	Labour and Employment Department Gujarat	40	0	2	—	—

1
Ministry of Railways74/100
3 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
56
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Defence47/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas47/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Railways	74	3	5	1	—
2	Ministry of Defence	47	1	0	—	—
3	Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises	47	0	1	—	—
4	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	47	1	0	—	—

1
Madhya Pradesh68/100
1 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Rajasthan68/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
West Bengal68/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Bihar57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Delhi57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Haryana57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Jharkhand57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Maharashtra57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Gujarat55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Uttar Pradesh44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Madhya Pradesh	68	1	1	1	—
2	Rajasthan	68	1	1	—	—
3	West Bengal	68	2	0	—	—
4	Bihar	57	0	1	—	—
5	Delhi	57	1	0	—	—
6	Haryana	57	0	1	—	—
7	Jharkhand	57	1	0	—	—
8	Maharashtra	57	0	1	—	—
9	Gujarat	55	0	2	—	—
10	Uttar Pradesh	44	0	1	—	—

1
Begusarai57/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
West Delhi57/100
Delhi ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Gurgaon57/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Hoshangabad57/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Jabalpur57/100
Madhya Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Nagpur57/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Kota57/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Bardhaman57/100
West Bengal ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Malda57/100
West Bengal ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Surat55/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Begusarai	57	0	1	—	—
2	West Delhi	57	1	0	—	—
3	Gurgaon	57	0	1	—	—
4	Hoshangabad	57	0	1	1	—
5	Jabalpur	57	1	0	—	—
6	Nagpur	57	0	1	—	—
7	Kota	57	0	1	—	—
8	Bardhaman	57	1	0	—	—
9	Malda	57	1	0	—	—
10	Surat	55	0	2	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

True RMS Clamp Meter (V2): GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor