Theft Proof Rifle Racks: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Theft Proof Rifle Racks on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 4Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 4
Closed in period: 75
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: 1

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

2 Mar 2026

7 Apr 2026

9 May 2026

10 Jun 2026

1717 Jul 2026

8 Aug 2026

16 Sept 2026

9 Oct 2026

1 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	2
Apr 2026	7
May 2026	9
Jun 2026	10
Jul 2026	17
Aug 2026	8
Sept 2026	16
Oct 2026	9
Nov 2026	1

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 83%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 50%
Reverse auction: 5%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Theft Proof Rifle Racks72/100
4 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
99
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
AMC of Integrated Security and Surveillance System42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Theft Proof Rifle Racks	72	4	75	1	—
2	AMC of Integrated Security and Surveillance System	42	0	3	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
AMC of Integrated Security and Surveillance System100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Theft Proof Rifle Racks99/100
4 live · 1 bidders avg · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
99
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	AMC of Integrated Security and Surveillance System	100	0	3	—	—
2	Theft Proof Rifle Racks	99	4	75	1	—

1
Department of Military Affairs80/100
Ministry of Defence ·3 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
89
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
97
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Central Armed Police Forces64/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
84
Momentum
33
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Indian Railways47/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
49
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Airports Authority of India (aai)46/100
Ministry of Civil Aviation ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Indian Audit and Accounts Department34/100
Comptroller and Auditor General (cag) of India ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Home Department Odisha34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Power Department Delhi31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of Revenue31/100
Ministry of Finance ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Department of Space31/100
Department of Space ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Materials31/100
Ministry of Mines ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	80	3	34	1	—
2	Central Armed Police Forces	64	1	19	—	—
3	Indian Railways	47	0	5	—	—
4	Airports Authority of India (aai)	46	0	4	—	—
5	Indian Audit and Accounts Department	34	0	2	—	—
6	Home Department Odisha	34	0	2	—	—
7	Power Department Delhi	31	0	1	—	—
8	Department of Revenue	31	0	1	—	—
9	Department of Space	31	0	1	—	—
10	Materials	31	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence80/100
3 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
89
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
97
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Home Affairs64/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
85
Momentum
31
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Railways47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
49
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Civil Aviation46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Comptroller and Auditor General (cag) of India34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Power31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Finance31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Mines31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Department of Space31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	80	3	34	1	—
2	Ministry of Home Affairs	64	1	20	—	—
3	Ministry of Railways	47	0	5	—	—
4	Ministry of Civil Aviation	46	0	4	—	—
5	Comptroller and Auditor General (cag) of India	34	0	2	—	—
6	Ministry of Power	31	0	1	—	—
7	Ministry of Finance	31	0	1	—	—
8	Ministry of Mines	31	0	1	—	—
9	Department of Space	31	0	1	—	—
10	Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser	31	0	1	—	—

1
Uttar Pradesh83/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Assam75/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
93
Momentum
73
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Delhi71/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
80
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Jammu & Kashmir61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
96
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
West Bengal56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Punjab54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Gujarat52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Maharashtra52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Odisha52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Arunachal Pradesh49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Uttar Pradesh	83	1	10	—	—
2	Assam	75	1	8	—	—
3	Delhi	71	1	4	—	—
4	Jammu & Kashmir	61	0	10	—	—
5	West Bengal	56	0	6	—	—
6	Punjab	54	0	5	—	—
7	Gujarat	52	0	4	—	—
8	Maharashtra	52	0	4	—	—
9	Odisha	52	0	4	—	—
10	Arunachal Pradesh	49	0	3	—	—

1
Meerut83/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Sonitpur76/100
Assam ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
South West Delhi63/100
Delhi ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ernakulam63/100
Kerala ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Jalpaiguri59/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Kheri57/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Rajkot56/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Baramulla56/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Kathua56/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Koraput56/100
Odisha ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Meerut	83	0	5	—	—
2	Sonitpur	76	1	2	—	—
3	South West Delhi	63	1	1	—	—
4	Ernakulam	63	1	1	—	—
5	Jalpaiguri	59	0	4	—	—
6	Kheri	57	1	0	—	—
7	Rajkot	56	0	3	—	—
8	Baramulla	56	0	3	—	—
9	Kathua	56	0	3	—	—
10	Koraput	56	0	3	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Theft Proof Rifle Racks: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor