Tea CTC (V2) (Defence): GeM business opportunity

Who buys Tea CTC (V2) (Defence) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 19Awarded results: 6Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 19
Closed in period: 412
Awarded results: 6
Median winning price (L1): ₹2.3 lakh
Avg bidders per bid: 3.5

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

5 Mar 2026

42 Apr 2026

58 May 2026

33 Jun 2026

8787 Jul 2026

78 Aug 2026

55 Sept 2026

57 Oct 2026

16 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	5
Apr 2026	42
May 2026	58
Jun 2026	33
Jul 2026	87
Aug 2026	78
Sept 2026	55
Oct 2026	57
Nov 2026	16

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 68%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 90%
Reverse auction: 3%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Tea CTC (V2) (Defence)87/100
19 live · 3.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.3 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
88
Easy criteria
100
Order value
100

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Tea CTC (V2) (Defence)	87	19	412	3.5	₹2.3 lakh

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Tea CTC (V2) (Defence)92/100
19 live · 3.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.3 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
88
Easy criteria
100
Order value
100

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Tea CTC (V2) (Defence)	92	19	412	3.5	₹2.3 lakh

1
Department of Military Affairs87/100
Ministry of Defence ·19 live · 3.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.3 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
52
Low competition
88
Easy criteria
100
Order value
100
2
Department of Defence46/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
46
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	87	19	397	3.5	₹2.3 lakh
2	Department of Defence	46	0	15	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence87/100
19 live · 3.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.3 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
88
Easy criteria
100
Order value
100

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	87	19	412	3.5	₹2.3 lakh

1
Jammu & Kashmir74/100
9 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
94
Momentum
69
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
West Bengal73/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Rajasthan70/100
2 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
38
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Uttar Pradesh67/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
82
Momentum
51
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Tamil Nadu63/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
36
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Madhya Pradesh62/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
69
Momentum
42
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Karnataka62/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
51
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Jharkhand60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
58
Momentum
48
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Punjab60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
58
Momentum
48
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Assam56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
71
Momentum
13
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Jammu & Kashmir	74	9	69	—	—
2	West Bengal	73	3	20	—	—
3	Rajasthan	70	2	104	1	—
4	Uttar Pradesh	67	1	45	—	—
5	Tamil Nadu	63	1	36	—	—
6	Madhya Pradesh	62	1	23	—	—
7	Karnataka	62	0	20	—	—
8	Jharkhand	60	1	13	—	—
9	Punjab	60	1	13	—	—
10	Assam	56	0	26	—	—

1
Jammu78/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·6 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
80
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ganganagar74/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
94
Momentum
67
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Darjeeling74/100
West Bengal ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Udhampur68/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
59
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Allahabad68/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
59
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Alwar67/100
Rajasthan ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
94
Momentum
34
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Sagar67/100
Madhya Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
84
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Mathura67/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
84
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Chennai64/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
82
Momentum
35
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Nilgiris64/100
Tamil Nadu ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
80
Momentum
37
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Jammu	78	6	32	—	—
2	Ganganagar	74	0	30	—	—
3	Darjeeling	74	2	11	—	—
4	Udhampur	68	3	14	—	—
5	Allahabad	68	0	17	—	—
6	Alwar	67	2	28	—	—
7	Sagar	67	1	7	—	—
8	Mathura	67	0	8	—	—
9	Chennai	64	0	19	—	—
10	Nilgiris	64	1	17	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

4 wins
2 wins

2 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

Bids won by MSE sellers100%

of 6 awarded bids with the MSE flag

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Tea CTC (V2) (Defence): GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor