Surveillance Drone / Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (V2) (Defence Forces - Navy, Army and Air Force): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Surveillance Drone / Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (V2) (Defence Forces - Navy, Army and Air Force) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 3
- Closed in period
- 80
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- —
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 2 |
| Apr 2026 | 3 |
| May 2026 | 7 |
| Jun 2026 | 15 |
| Jul 2026 | 17 |
| Aug 2026 | 19 |
| Sept 2026 | 13 |
| Oct 2026 | 5 |
| Nov 2026 | 1 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 42%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 100%
- Reverse auction
- 4%
based on 82 bids
based on 2 bids
based on 81 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 16
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 16
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Surveillance Drone / Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (V2) (Defence Forces - Navy, Army and Air Force) | 72 | 3 | 80 | — | — |
| 2 | Remote Controlled Lifebuoy | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Hiring Of Agency For ISO Certification Service | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
3 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Surveillance Drone / Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (V2) (Defence Forces - Navy, Army and Air Force) | 99 | 3 | 80 | — | — |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 73
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Indian Railways46/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 44
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Department of Home43/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 34
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Department of Defence33/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Coal India Limited33/100
Ministry of Coal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 17
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 77 | 3 | 54 | — | — |
| 2 | Indian Railways | 46 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 3 | Home Department Maharashtra | 44 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 4 | Department of Home | 43 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of Defence | 33 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Coal India Limited | 33 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Citizen Resources Information Department | 33 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Education Department Chandigarh | 33 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Urban Development and Urban Housing Department Gujarat | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Information Technology Department Lakshadweep | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence76/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 70
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Railways46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 44
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Home Affairs43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 34
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Coal33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 76 | 3 | 56 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Railways | 46 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Home Affairs | 43 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Coal | 33 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Jammu & Kashmir83/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Haryana79/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 89
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Punjab79/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 89
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Uttarakhand71/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 73
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 75
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Assam63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6West Bengal63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Gujarat61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 95
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Maharashtra61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 95
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Madhya Pradesh59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 89
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Rajasthan59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 89
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jammu & Kashmir | 83 | 1 | 7 | — | — |
| 2 | Haryana | 79 | 1 | 5 | — | — |
| 3 | Punjab | 79 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 4 | Uttarakhand | 71 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Assam | 63 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 6 | West Bengal | 63 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 7 | Gujarat | 61 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 8 | Maharashtra | 61 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 9 | Madhya Pradesh | 59 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 10 | Rajasthan | 59 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
- 1Ambala74/100
Haryana ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Mumbai63/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Dehradun62/100
Uttarakhand ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Tinsukia57/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 83
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Gurdaspur57/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 83
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Darjeeling57/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 83
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Jammu56/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Jamnagar54/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Pondicherry54/100
Puducherry ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Kamrup42/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ambala | 74 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 2 | Mumbai | 63 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 3 | Dehradun | 62 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Tinsukia | 57 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 5 | Gurdaspur | 57 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 6 | Darjeeling | 57 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 7 | Jammu | 56 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 8 | Jamnagar | 54 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 9 | Pondicherry | 54 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 10 | Kamrup | 42 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.