Submersible Sewerage Pump: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Submersible Sewerage Pump on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 4Awarded results: 1Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 4
Closed in period: 190
Awarded results: 1
Median winning price (L1): ₹1.1 lakh
Avg bidders per bid: 3

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

10 Mar 2026

20 Apr 2026

13 May 2026

26 Jun 2026

5151 Jul 2026

27 Aug 2026

23 Sept 2026

21 Oct 2026

3 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	10
Apr 2026	20
May 2026	13
Jun 2026	26
Jul 2026	51
Aug 2026	27
Sept 2026	23
Oct 2026	21
Nov 2026	3

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 60%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 0%
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Submersible Sewerage Pump72/100
4 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.1 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
99
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Self Priming Pump Conforming To IS 512031/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
21
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Submersible Sewerage Pump	72	4	190	3	₹1.1 lakh
2	Self Priming Pump Conforming To IS 5120	31	0	2	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Submersible Sewerage Pump99/100
4 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.1 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
99
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Submersible Sewerage Pump	99	4	190	3	₹1.1 lakh

1
Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh76/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
68
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
99
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Panchayats and Rural Housing Department Gujarat70/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
77
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department Tamil Nadu59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
55
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Panchayati Raj58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
66
Momentum
26
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Indian Railways57/100
Ministry of Railways ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
28
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Rural Development Department53/100
0 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.1 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Space50/100
Department of Space ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
16
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Urban Development Department Karnataka50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
16
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Department of Atomic Energy47/100
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Revenue Department Andaman & Nicobar46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
45
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh	76	2	76	—	—
2	Panchayats and Rural Housing Department Gujarat	70	0	23	—	—
3	Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department Tamil Nadu	59	0	8	—	—
4	Department of Panchayati Raj	58	0	17	—	—
5	Indian Railways	57	1	15	—	—
6	Rural Development Department	53	0	2	3	₹1.1 lakh
7	Department of Space	50	1	0	—	—
8	Urban Development Department Karnataka	50	0	1	—	—
9	Department of Atomic Energy	47	0	7	—	—
10	Revenue Department Andaman & Nicobar	46	0	6	—	—

1
Ministry of Railways68/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
28
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Pmo55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Space52/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Power51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Defence32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Home Affairs32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Railways	68	1	15	—	—
2	Pmo	55	0	7	—	—
3	Department of Space	52	1	0	—	—
4	Ministry of Power	51	0	5	—	—
5	Ministry of Defence	32	0	1	—	—
6	Ministry of Home Affairs	32	0	1	—	—
7	Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises	32	0	1	—	—
8	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	32	0	1	—	—
9	Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways	32	0	1	—	—
10	Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers	32	0	1	—	—

1
Uttar Pradesh75/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
64
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
99
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Gujarat67/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
57
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Tamil Nadu62/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
66
Momentum
49
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Maharashtra57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
34
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Bihar49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Madhya Pradesh47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
47
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Rajasthan45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
40
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
West Bengal43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Chhattisgarh42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
31
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Jammu & Kashmir42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
31
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Uttar Pradesh	75	2	81	—	—
2	Gujarat	67	0	31	—	—
3	Tamil Nadu	62	1	17	—	—
4	Maharashtra	57	0	13	—	—
5	Bihar	49	0	10	—	—
6	Madhya Pradesh	47	0	7	—	—
7	Rajasthan	45	0	5	—	—
8	West Bengal	43	0	4	—	—
9	Chhattisgarh	42	0	3	—	—
10	Jammu & Kashmir	42	0	3	—	—

1
Rajkot73/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Chennai71/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Chitrakoot71/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Unnao69/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
34
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Nilgiris69/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
91
Momentum
44
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Porbandar69/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
55
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Farrukhabad68/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Maharajganj68/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Saharanpur67/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
63
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
86
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Gonda55/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
74
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Rajkot	73	0	5	—	—
2	Chennai	71	0	4	—	—
3	Chitrakoot	71	0	4	—	—
4	Unnao	69	1	12	—	—
5	Nilgiris	69	0	10	—	—
6	Porbandar	69	0	8	—	—
7	Farrukhabad	68	0	3	—	—
8	Maharajganj	68	0	3	—	—
9	Saharanpur	67	1	6	—	—
10	Gonda	55	0	6	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

1 wins

1 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

Bids won by MSE sellers0%

of 1 awarded bids with the MSE flag

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Submersible Sewerage Pump: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor