Spotting Scope: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Spotting Scope on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 1
- Closed in period
- 12
- Awarded results
- 1
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹1.4 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 5
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 0 |
| May 2026 | 1 |
| Jun 2026 | 6 |
| Jul 2026 | 0 |
| Aug 2026 | 1 |
| Sept 2026 | 3 |
| Oct 2026 | 1 |
| Nov 2026 | 1 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 67%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 100%
- Reverse auction
- 8%
based on 12 bids
based on 1 bids
based on 12 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Spotting Scope73/100
1 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.4 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Hand Held Search Light53/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 26
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 26
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spotting Scope | 73 | 1 | 12 | 5 | ₹1.4 lakh |
| 2 | Hand Held Search Light | 53 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 3 | Digital Camouflage (Jacket and Trouser) Polyester Cotton (in sets) ICG | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Spotting Scope100/100
1 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.4 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spotting Scope | 100 | 1 | 12 | 5 | ₹1.4 lakh |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·1 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.4 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 93
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Women Safety Division41/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 53
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Department of Defence35/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 81 | 1 | 6 | 5 | ₹1.4 lakh |
| 2 | Women Safety Division | 41 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Department of Defence | 35 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Department of Defence Production | 35 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Forests and Environment Department Gujarat | 35 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Home Department Andhra Pradesh | 35 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence77/100
1 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.4 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 72
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Home Affairs39/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 48
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 77 | 1 | 8 | 5 | ₹1.4 lakh |
| 2 | Ministry of Home Affairs | 39 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Jammu & Kashmir79/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 81
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Gujarat45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Sikkim45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Andhra Pradesh38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Rajasthan38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Tamil Nadu38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7West Bengal38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jammu & Kashmir | 79 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 2 | Gujarat | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Sikkim | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Andhra Pradesh | 38 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Rajasthan | 38 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Tamil Nadu | 38 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | West Bengal | 38 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Baramulla64/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Jammu55/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3East Sikkim55/100
Sikkim ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Guntur44/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Jamnagar44/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Kachchh44/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Poonch44/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Jaipur44/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Tiruchirappalli44/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Bardhaman44/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baramulla | 64 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 2 | Jammu | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | East Sikkim | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Guntur | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Jamnagar | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Kachchh | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Poonch | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Jaipur | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Tiruchirappalli | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Bardhaman | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
1 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesof 1 awarded bids with the MSE flag
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.