Software Support Services 2.0: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Software Support Services 2.0 on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 7
- Closed in period
- 97
- Awarded results
- 1
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹39,000
- Avg bidders per bid
- 5
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 2 |
| Apr 2026 | 10 |
| May 2026 | 6 |
| Jun 2026 | 13 |
| Jul 2026 | 22 |
| Aug 2026 | 10 |
| Sept 2026 | 24 |
| Oct 2026 | 15 |
| Nov 2026 | 2 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 57%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 100%
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 98 bids
based on 1 bids
based on 95 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
7 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹39,000
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 49
- Momentum
- 39
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 15
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 15
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 15
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 15
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Custom Bid for Services29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 15
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Software Support Services 2.0 | 73 | 7 | 97 | 5 | ₹39,000 |
| 2 | AMC of Integrated Security and Surveillance System | 55 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
| 3 | Software Intelligence System for Application Development and Maintenance | 49 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Customized AMC/CMC for Pre-owned Products | 32 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Maintenance of landline and broadband networks - Cluster Outsourcing model | 32 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Document Management Software (V2) | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Database Management System Software (V3) | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Operating System Software (V3) | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Custom Bid for Services | 29 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
7 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹39,000 · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 49
- Momentum
- 39
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Software Support Services 2.0 | 100 | 7 | 97 | 5 | ₹39,000 |
| 2 | AMC of Integrated Security and Surveillance System | 100 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·2 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹39,000
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 54
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Energy Department Odisha64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 87
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Indian Railways51/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 73 | 2 | 30 | 5 | ₹39,000 |
| 2 | Energy Department Odisha | 64 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 3 | Department of Electronics and Information Technology | 57 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Home Department Uttar Pradesh | 57 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of Heavy Industry | 51 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 6 | Indian Railways | 51 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Water Resources Department Karnataka | 51 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Finance Department Kerala | 51 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 9 | Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (mmrda) | 51 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 10 | Agriculture Department Uttar Pradesh | 51 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence72/100
2 live · 5 bidders avg · L1 ₹39,000
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 47
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 38
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Finance51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Railways51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 53
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Ministry of Education46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 44
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 72 | 2 | 35 | 5 | ₹39,000 |
| 2 | Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology | 56 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Finance | 51 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Railways | 51 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises | 51 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 6 | Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas | 49 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 7 | Ministry of Education | 46 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 8 | Ministry of Commerce and Industry | 34 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Ministry of Civil Aviation | 34 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs (mohua) | 34 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Uttar Pradesh74/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 91
- Momentum
- 69
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Kerala72/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 64
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Karnataka71/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 76
- Momentum
- 77
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Assam70/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 59
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Maharashtra66/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 17
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Odisha66/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 53
- Momentum
- 87
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Delhi64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 84
- Momentum
- 29
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8West Bengal63/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 35
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Gujarat50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 59
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Goa46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uttar Pradesh | 74 | 1 | 14 | — | — |
| 2 | Kerala | 72 | 2 | 4 | — | — |
| 3 | Karnataka | 71 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
| 4 | Assam | 70 | 1 | 4 | — | — |
| 5 | Maharashtra | 66 | 1 | 19 | — | — |
| 6 | Odisha | 66 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 7 | Delhi | 64 | 0 | 12 | — | — |
| 8 | West Bengal | 63 | 1 | 9 | — | — |
| 9 | Gujarat | 50 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 10 | Goa | 46 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1Mumbai68/100
Maharashtra ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 27
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Bangalore68/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 87
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ernakulam68/100
Kerala ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 87
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Jharsuguda68/100
Odisha ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 87
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Kolkata66/100
West Bengal ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 83
- Momentum
- 43
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Kamrup61/100
Assam ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 53
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7South Delhi53/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Thane51/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Jhansi51/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10South Goa48/100
Goa ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 53
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mumbai | 68 | 1 | 12 | — | — |
| 2 | Bangalore | 68 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 3 | Ernakulam | 68 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Jharsuguda | 68 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 5 | Kolkata | 66 | 1 | 7 | — | — |
| 6 | Kamrup | 61 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | South Delhi | 53 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 8 | Thane | 51 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 9 | Jhansi | 51 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 10 | South Goa | 48 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
1 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesAI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.