Soda Ash (V2) conforming to IS 251: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Soda Ash (V2) conforming to IS 251 on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 0Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 0
Closed in period: 12
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

1 Mar 2026

1 Apr 2026

1 May 2026

3 Jun 2026

44 Jul 2026

0 Aug 2026

2 Sept 2026

0 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	1
Apr 2026	1
May 2026	1
Jun 2026	3
Jul 2026	4
Aug 2026	0
Sept 2026	2
Oct 2026	0
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 83%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: —
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Soda Ash (V2) conforming to IS 25173/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Caustic Soda - (Solid and Lye) for ONGC as per IS 25243/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Sodium Carbonate Anhydrous (V2) Conforming to IS 29643/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Soda Ash (ONGC)43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Aluminium Oxide43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Copper Sulphate (V3) Conforming to IS 26143/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Household Laundry Detergent Powders (V2) Conforming to IS 495543/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Alumino - Ferric (V2) Conforming to IS 29943/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Sodium Nitrate as per IS: 1268143/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Liquid Lab Wash Detergent43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
27
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Soda Ash (V2) conforming to IS 251	73	12	—	—
2	Caustic Soda - (Solid and Lye) for ONGC as per IS 252	43	1	—	—
3	Sodium Carbonate Anhydrous (V2) Conforming to IS 296	43	1	—	—
4	Soda Ash (ONGC)	43	1	—	—
5	Aluminium Oxide	43	1	—	—
6	Copper Sulphate (V3) Conforming to IS 261	43	1	—	—
7	Household Laundry Detergent Powders (V2) Conforming to IS 4955	43	1	—	—
8	Alumino - Ferric (V2) Conforming to IS 299	43	1	—	—
9	Sodium Nitrate as per IS: 12681	43	1	—	—
10	Liquid Lab Wash Detergent	43	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Soda Ash (V2) conforming to IS 251100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Soda Ash (V2) conforming to IS 251	100	0	12	—	—

1
Department of Military Affairs65/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Coal India Limited65/100
Ministry of Coal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Steel Authority of India Limited65/100
Ministry of Steel ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Central Armed Police Forces54/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Indian Oil Corporation Limited54/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Materials54/100
Ministry of Mines ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited54/100
Ministry of Steel ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	65	2	—	—
2	Coal India Limited	65	2	—	—
3	Steel Authority of India Limited	65	2	—	—
4	Central Armed Police Forces	54	1	—	—
5	Indian Oil Corporation Limited	54	1	—	—
6	Materials	54	1	—	—
7	Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited	54	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Steel73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Defence59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Coal59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Home Affairs50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Labour and Employment50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Mines50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Steel	73	3	—	—
2	Ministry of Defence	59	2	—	—
3	Ministry of Coal	59	2	—	—
4	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	59	2	—	—
5	Ministry of Home Affairs	50	1	—	—
6	Ministry of Labour and Employment	50	1	—	—
7	Ministry of Mines	50	1	—	—

1
Odisha73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Andhra Pradesh59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Uttar Pradesh59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
West Bengal59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Delhi50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Haryana50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Jammu & Kashmir50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Odisha	73	3	—	—
2	Andhra Pradesh	59	2	—	—
3	Uttar Pradesh	59	2	—	—
4	West Bengal	59	2	—	—
5	Delhi	50	1	—	—
6	Haryana	50	1	—	—
7	Jammu & Kashmir	50	1	—	—

1
Visakhapatnam65/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Sundergarh65/100
Odisha ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Bardhaman65/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
South West Delhi54/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Panipat54/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Jammu54/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Angul54/100
Odisha ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Gautam Buddha Nagar54/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Jhansi54/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Visakhapatnam	65	2	—	—
2	Sundergarh	65	2	—	—
3	Bardhaman	65	2	—	—
4	South West Delhi	54	1	—	—
5	Panipat	54	1	—	—
6	Jammu	54	1	—	—
7	Angul	54	1	—	—
8	Gautam Buddha Nagar	54	1	—	—
9	Jhansi	54	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Soda Ash (V2) conforming to IS 251: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor