Reverse Osmosis based Point of Use Water Treatment System for Drinking Purposes (V3) as per IS 16240: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Reverse Osmosis based Point of Use Water Treatment System for Drinking Purposes (V3) as per IS 16240 on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 7
- Closed in period
- 77
- Awarded results
- 1
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹15 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 4
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 5 |
| Apr 2026 | 7 |
| May 2026 | 8 |
| Jun 2026 | 13 |
| Jul 2026 | 10 |
| Aug 2026 | 17 |
| Sept 2026 | 12 |
| Oct 2026 | 9 |
| Nov 2026 | 3 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 79%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 0%
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 82 bids
based on 6 bids
based on 82 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Reverse Osmosis based Point of Use Water Treatment System for Drinking Purposes (V3) as per IS 1624072/100
7 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹15 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 25
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 25
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 16
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Deep freezer30/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 16
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reverse Osmosis based Point of Use Water Treatment System for Drinking Purposes (V3) as per IS 16240 | 72 | 7 | 77 | 4 | ₹15 lakh |
| 2 | Stationary Storage Type Electric Water Heaters (Geyser) (V3) ISI Marked to IS 2082 | 52 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Household Refrigerators marked to IS 17550 (V2) | 52 | 2 | 0 | — | — |
| 4 | Split Air Conditioner, Wall Mount Type (V3) ISI Marked to IS 1391 (Part 2) | 50 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 5 | Household Refrigerating Appliances as per IS 17550 | 43 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 6 | Reverse Osmosis based Water Treatment System above 50 LPH Capacity (V2) | 42 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 7 | Deep freezer | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 31
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Reverse Osmosis based Point of Use Water Treatment System for Drinking Purposes (V3) as per IS 1624098/100
7 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹15 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Household Refrigerating Appliances as per IS 17550 | 100 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 2 | Reverse Osmosis based Water Treatment System above 50 LPH Capacity (V2) | 100 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Reverse Osmosis based Point of Use Water Treatment System for Drinking Purposes (V3) as per IS 16240 | 98 | 7 | 77 | 4 | ₹15 lakh |
- 1Indian Railways77/100
Ministry of Railways ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 74
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
Ministry of Power ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹15 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 54
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 23
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 23
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
Ministry of Power ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 23
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 54
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Coal India Limited49/100
Ministry of Coal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 54
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Indian Railways | 77 | 2 | 17 | — | — |
| 2 | Bhakra Beas Managemet Board | 66 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Local Self Government Department Kerala | 61 | 0 | 4 | 4 | ₹15 lakh |
| 4 | Panchayats and Rural Housing Department Gujarat | 52 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 5 | Energy Department Madhya Pradesh | 52 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 6 | Education Department Bihar | 52 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 7 | Powergrid Southern Interconnector Transmission System Limited | 52 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 8 | Department of Military Affairs | 49 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 9 | Coal India Limited | 49 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 10 | Department of Fertilizers | 46 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Railways77/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 74
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Power70/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Defence50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Coal49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 54
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Ministry of Finance46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Pmo46/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 37
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Ministry of Steel36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 37
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Ministry of Home Affairs32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 23
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Railways | 77 | 2 | 17 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Power | 70 | 2 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Defence | 50 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Coal | 49 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Finance | 46 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers | 46 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 7 | Pmo | 46 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 8 | Ministry of Law and Justice | 36 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Ministry of Steel | 36 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Ministry of Home Affairs | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Kerala83/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2West Bengal73/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 52
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Madhya Pradesh73/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 67
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Tamil Nadu73/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 67
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Gujarat60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Maharashtra60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Odisha60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Karnataka56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Chhattisgarh53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 70
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Delhi51/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kerala | 83 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
| 2 | West Bengal | 73 | 1 | 8 | — | — |
| 3 | Madhya Pradesh | 73 | 1 | 6 | — | — |
| 4 | Tamil Nadu | 73 | 1 | 6 | — | — |
| 5 | Gujarat | 60 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 6 | Maharashtra | 60 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 7 | Odisha | 60 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 8 | Karnataka | 56 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 9 | Chhattisgarh | 53 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 10 | Delhi | 51 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1Kottayam76/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Malda76/100
West Bengal ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Bangalore63/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Bhopal63/100
Madhya Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Tiruchirappalli63/100
Tamil Nadu ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Chennai59/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Guntur57/100
Andhra Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Patna57/100
Bihar ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Bhiwani57/100
Haryana ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Kasargod57/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kottayam | 76 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 2 | Malda | 76 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Bangalore | 63 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 4 | Bhopal | 63 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Tiruchirappalli | 63 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Chennai | 59 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 7 | Guntur | 57 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 8 | Patna | 57 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 9 | Bhiwani | 57 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 10 | Kasargod | 57 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
1 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesof 1 awarded bids with the MSE flag
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.