Professional Training Services (Version 2): GeM business opportunity

Who buys Professional Training Services (Version 2) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 29Awarded results: 4Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 29
Closed in period: 424
Awarded results: 4
Median winning price (L1): ₹5.5 lakh
Avg bidders per bid: 4.5

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

1 Feb 2026

11 Mar 2026

16 Apr 2026

45 May 2026

9090 Jun 2026

75 Jul 2026

64 Aug 2026

76 Sept 2026

64 Oct 2026

11 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	1
Mar 2026	11
Apr 2026	16
May 2026	45
Jun 2026	90
Jul 2026	75
Aug 2026	64
Sept 2026	76
Oct 2026	64
Nov 2026	11

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 68%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 50%
Reverse auction: 1%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Professional Training Services (Version 2)85/100
29 live · 4.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹5.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
81
Easy criteria
100
Order value
100
2
Professional Painting Service43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
34
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Professional Training Services (Version 2)	85	29	424	4.5	₹5.5 lakh
2	Professional Painting Service	43	0	7	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Professional Painting Service100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
34
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Professional Training Services (Version 2)87/100
29 live · 4.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹5.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
81
Easy criteria
100
Order value
100

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Professional Painting Service	100	0	7	—	—
2	Professional Training Services (Version 2)	87	29	424	4.5	₹5.5 lakh

1
Department of Military Affairs80/100
Ministry of Defence ·8 live · 3.3 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.1 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
39
Low competition
90
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Defence65/100
Ministry of Defence ·4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
66
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Forests and Environment Department Gujarat64/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
38
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Tribal Development Department Maharashtra64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
38
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Labour and Employment Department Gujarat63/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
62
Momentum
59
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Department of Telecommunications (dot)63/100
Ministry of Communications ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
92
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Panchayati Raj62/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises61/100
Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
29
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Indian Oil Corporation Limited60/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd60/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	80	8	227	3.3	₹2.1 lakh
2	Department of Defence	65	4	27	—	—
3	Forests and Environment Department Gujarat	64	2	5	—	—
4	Tribal Development Department Maharashtra	64	0	7	—	—
5	Labour and Employment Department Gujarat	63	4	24	—	—
6	Department of Telecommunications (dot)	63	0	9	—	—
7	Department of Panchayati Raj	62	2	3	—	—
8	Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises	61	1	3	—	—
9	Indian Oil Corporation Limited	60	0	3	—	—
10	Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd	60	0	3	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence81/100
14 live · 3.3 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.1 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
43
Low competition
90
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Communications63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
41
Momentum
92
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises61/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
29
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Education42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Coal42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Civil Aviation31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ministry of Corporate Affairs31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
20
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	81	14	262	3.3	₹2.1 lakh
2	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	64	0	8	—	—
3	Ministry of Communications	63	0	9	—	—
4	Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises	61	1	3	—	—
5	Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship	60	0	3	—	—
6	Ministry of Education	42	0	5	—	—
7	Ministry of Coal	42	0	5	—	—
8	Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change	40	0	3	—	—
9	Ministry of Civil Aviation	31	0	2	—	—
10	Ministry of Corporate Affairs	31	0	2	—	—

1
Maharashtra75/100
6 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
94
Momentum
71
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Gujarat71/100
6 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
44
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Uttar Pradesh71/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
74
Momentum
79
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Karnataka71/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
97
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
West Bengal71/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
97
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Kerala69/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
59
Momentum
95
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Tamil Nadu66/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Delhi63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
16
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Chhattisgarh62/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
31
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Madhya Pradesh61/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
34
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Maharashtra	75	6	58	—	—
2	Gujarat	71	6	78	—	—
3	Uttar Pradesh	71	1	25	—	—
4	Karnataka	71	2	15	—	—
5	West Bengal	71	0	17	—	—
6	Kerala	69	3	10	—	—
7	Tamil Nadu	66	1	5	—	—
8	Delhi	63	0	53	—	—
9	Chhattisgarh	62	0	3	—	—
10	Madhya Pradesh	61	1	23	—	—

1
Ernakulam74/100
Kerala ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Pune72/100
Maharashtra ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Lucknow69/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
75
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Thane69/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
55
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Mumbai68/100
Maharashtra ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
69
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Bangalore67/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
59
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ahmedabad66/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
46
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Dahod66/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
46
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Panchkula66/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
46
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Coimbatore66/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
46
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ernakulam	74	3	9	—	—
2	Pune	72	3	30	—	—
3	Lucknow	69	0	11	—	—
4	Thane	69	0	6	—	—
5	Mumbai	68	1	11	—	—
6	Bangalore	67	0	14	—	—
7	Ahmedabad	66	0	4	—	—
8	Dahod	66	0	4	—	—
9	Panchkula	66	0	4	—	—
10	Coimbatore	66	0	4	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins

4 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

Bids won by MSE sellers50%

of 2 awarded bids with the MSE flag

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Professional Training Services (Version 2): GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor