Printed Circuit Board: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Printed Circuit Board on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 1
- Closed in period
- 29
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- —
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 5 |
| May 2026 | 6 |
| Jun 2026 | 5 |
| Jul 2026 | 3 |
| Aug 2026 | 5 |
| Sept 2026 | 2 |
| Oct 2026 | 3 |
| Nov 2026 | 1 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 86%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 0%
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 29 bids
based on 1 bids
based on 29 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Printed Circuit Board73/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Rectifier diode47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 47
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Resistors (V2)47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 47
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Printed Circuit Board | 73 | 1 | 29 | — | — |
| 2 | Rectifier diode | 47 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 3 | Resistors (V2) | 47 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 4 | Flux Cored Solder Wire as per IS 1921 | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Controller for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Printed Circuit Board100/100
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Rectifier diode100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 47
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Resistors (V2)100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 47
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Printed Circuit Board | 100 | 1 | 29 | — | — |
| 2 | Rectifier diode | 100 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 3 | Resistors (V2) | 100 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
Ministry of Communications ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 82
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 82
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Gail India Limited51/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Department of Defence34/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 83 | 1 | 7 | — | — |
| 2 | Department of Telecommunications (dot) | 57 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 3 | Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh | 57 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 4 | Gail India Limited | 51 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Labour and Employment Department Gujarat | 40 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Department of Defence | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Department of Heavy Industry | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Indian Oil Corporation Limited | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Department of Public Enterprises | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Home Department Maharashtra | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence83/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 70
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Power34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 83 | 1 | 8 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Communications | 56 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas | 53 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Power | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Uttar Pradesh63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2West Bengal59/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Karnataka57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 81
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Jharkhand54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Maharashtra50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 58
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Gujarat39/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Andaman & Nicobar34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Assam34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Kerala34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Rajasthan34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uttar Pradesh | 63 | 0 | 10 | — | — |
| 2 | West Bengal | 59 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Karnataka | 57 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 4 | Jharkhand | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Maharashtra | 50 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Gujarat | 39 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Andaman & Nicobar | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Assam | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Kerala | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Rajasthan | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Bangalore63/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ranchi56/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Jalpaiguri56/100
West Bengal ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Lalitpur54/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Meerut54/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Raigad42/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7South Andaman36/100
Andaman & Nicobar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Sonitpur36/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Surat36/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Valsad36/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bangalore | 63 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 2 | Ranchi | 56 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Jalpaiguri | 56 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 4 | Lalitpur | 54 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Meerut | 54 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Raigad | 42 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | South Andaman | 36 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Sonitpur | 36 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Surat | 36 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Valsad | 36 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.