Phototherapy Unit (V2): GeM business opportunity

Who buys Phototherapy Unit (V2) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 3Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-09 – 2026-11-09 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 3
Closed in period: 15
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

1 Feb 2026

2 Mar 2026

1 Apr 2026

2 May 2026

1 Jun 2026

0 Jul 2026

2 Aug 2026

55 Sept 2026

4 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	1
Mar 2026	2
Apr 2026	1
May 2026	2
Jun 2026	1
Jul 2026	0
Aug 2026	2
Sept 2026	5
Oct 2026	4
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 28%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 0%
Reverse auction: 11%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Phototherapy Unit (V2)71/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
89
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Bilirubinometer32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Phototherapy Unit (V2)	71	3	15	—	—
2	Bilirubinometer	32	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Phototherapy Unit (V2)89/100
3 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
89
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Phototherapy Unit (V2)	89	3	15	—	—

1
Indian Railways83/100
Ministry of Railways ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Health and Family Welfare Department West Bengal69/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Defence63/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Military Affairs40/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Health and Family Welfare Department Delhi40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Department of Atomic Energy40/100
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Health & Family Welfare Department Gujarat40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Dr. Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Health Medical Education and Family Welfare Department Jharkhand40/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Health and Family Welfare Department Odisha40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Indian Railways	83	1	2	—	—
2	Health and Family Welfare Department West Bengal	69	1	1	—	—
3	Department of Defence	63	0	3	—	—
4	Department of Military Affairs	40	0	1	—	—
5	Health and Family Welfare Department Delhi	40	0	1	—	—
6	Department of Atomic Energy	40	0	1	—	—
7	Health & Family Welfare Department Gujarat	40	0	1	—	—
8	Dr. Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry	40	0	1	—	—
9	Health Medical Education and Family Welfare Department Jharkhand	40	1	0	—	—
10	Health and Family Welfare Department Odisha	40	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Railways78/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Defence63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Labour and Employment38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Pmo38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Ayush38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Railways	78	1	2	—	—
2	Ministry of Defence	63	0	4	—	—
3	Ministry of Labour and Employment	38	0	1	—	—
4	Pmo	38	0	1	—	—
5	Ministry of Ayush	38	0	1	—	—

1
West Bengal80/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
80
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Delhi43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Andhra Pradesh37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Assam37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Goa37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Gujarat37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Haryana37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Jammu & Kashmir37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Jharkhand37/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Karnataka37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	West Bengal	80	2	3	—	—
2	Delhi	43	0	2	—	—
3	Andhra Pradesh	37	0	1	—	—
4	Assam	37	0	1	—	—
5	Goa	37	0	1	—	—
6	Gujarat	37	0	1	—	—
7	Haryana	37	0	1	—	—
8	Jammu & Kashmir	37	0	1	—	—
9	Jharkhand	37	1	0	—	—
10	Karnataka	37	0	1	—	—

1
Malda83/100
West Bengal ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
North 24 Parganas69/100
West Bengal ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Guntur40/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Jorhat40/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
New Delhi40/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
North West Delhi40/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
North Goa40/100
Goa ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Rajkot40/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Hisar40/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Jammu40/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Malda	83	1	2	—	—
2	North 24 Parganas	69	1	1	—	—
3	Guntur	40	0	1	—	—
4	Jorhat	40	0	1	—	—
5	New Delhi	40	0	1	—	—
6	North West Delhi	40	0	1	—	—
7	North Goa	40	0	1	—	—
8	Rajkot	40	0	1	—	—
9	Hisar	40	0	1	—	—
10	Jammu	40	0	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Phototherapy Unit (V2): GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor