Ondansetron Tablet: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Ondansetron Tablet on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 2
- Closed in period
- 15
- Awarded results
- 1
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹91 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 3
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 1 |
| Apr 2026 | 2 |
| May 2026 | 2 |
| Jun 2026 | 2 |
| Jul 2026 | 1 |
| Aug 2026 | 2 |
| Sept 2026 | 4 |
| Oct 2026 | 2 |
| Nov 2026 | 1 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 57%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 50%
- Reverse auction
- 7%
based on 7 bids
based on 2 bids
based on 15 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Ondansetron Tablet73/100
2 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹91 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Metoprolol Tablet58/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 48
- Momentum
- 94
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Entecavir Tablet58/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 48
- Momentum
- 94
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Desvenlafaxine Tablets56/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 38
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Lamivudine Tablet56/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 38
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 38
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Imatinib Tablet56/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 38
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 38
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Letrozole Tablet55/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 67
- Momentum
- 47
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Flunarizine Tablet52/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ondansetron Tablet | 73 | 2 | 15 | 3 | ₹91 lakh |
| 2 | Metoprolol Tablet | 58 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Entecavir Tablet | 58 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Desvenlafaxine Tablets | 56 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Lamivudine Tablet | 56 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Bicalutamide Tablets (V2) | 56 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Imatinib Tablet | 56 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Sodium Hyaluronate Drops (V2) | 56 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Letrozole Tablet | 55 | 1 | 5 | — | — |
| 10 | Flunarizine Tablet | 52 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Ondansetron Tablet100/100
2 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹91 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ondansetron Tablet | 100 | 2 | 15 | 3 | ₹91 lakh |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 57
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Indian Railways63/100
Ministry of Railways ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹91 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Department of Defence43/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 66 | 1 | 4 | — | — |
| 2 | Indian Railways | 63 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Health and Family Welfare Department Chhattisgarh | 57 | 0 | 1 | 3 | ₹91 lakh |
| 4 | Health Department Andaman & Nicobar | 48 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of Defence | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Department of Health and Family Welfare | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Department of Defence Production | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Higher and Techical Education Department Jharkhand | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Health and Family Welfare Department Karnataka | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence70/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 35
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Railways60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 70 | 1 | 7 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Railways | 60 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Health and Family Welfare | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Uttar Pradesh66/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 57
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2West Bengal57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Andaman & Nicobar48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Karnataka43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Delhi37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Maharashtra37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Odisha37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Punjab37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Telangana37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uttar Pradesh | 66 | 1 | 4 | — | — |
| 2 | West Bengal | 57 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 3 | Andaman & Nicobar | 48 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Karnataka | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Delhi | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Maharashtra | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Odisha | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Punjab | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Telangana | 37 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Mathura60/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Purulia60/100
West Bengal ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3South Andaman55/100
Andaman & Nicobar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Gadag49/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5New Delhi40/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Mumbai40/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Koraput40/100
Odisha ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Kapurthala40/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Rangareddi40/100
Telangana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Agra40/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mathura | 60 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 2 | Purulia | 60 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 3 | South Andaman | 55 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Gadag | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | New Delhi | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Mumbai | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Koraput | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Kapurthala | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Rangareddi | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Agra | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
1 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesof 1 awarded bids with the MSE flag
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.