Mercuric Chloride: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Mercuric Chloride on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 0
- Closed in period
- 12
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- —
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 1 |
| May 2026 | 1 |
| Jun 2026 | 2 |
| Jul 2026 | 1 |
| Aug 2026 | 5 |
| Sept 2026 | 1 |
| Oct 2026 | 1 |
| Nov 2026 | 0 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 75%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- —
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 12 bids
based on 0 bids
based on 12 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Mercuric Chloride73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2GLACIAL ACETIC ACID69/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 54
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Hexane53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Acetaldehyde solution53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Bromoform53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mercuric Chloride | 73 | 0 | 12 | — | — |
| 2 | GLACIAL ACETIC ACID | 69 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Hexane | 53 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Gallic Acid For Ink Industry - IS 13206 | 53 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Formaldehyde Solution (V3) Conforming to IS 3321 | 53 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Sulphuric Acid (V2) Conforming to IS 266 | 53 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Acetaldehyde solution | 53 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Bromoform | 53 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Chloroform, Pure and Technical Conforming to IS 5296 | 53 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Methanol - (Commercial Grade) for ONGC as per IS 517 | 53 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Mercuric Chloride100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2GLACIAL ACETIC ACID100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 54
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mercuric Chloride | 100 | 0 | 12 | — | — |
| 2 | GLACIAL ACETIC ACID | 100 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1Home Department Kerala64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Energy Department Odisha55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Materials Management55/100
Ministry of Coal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Kiocl Limited44/100
Ministry of Steel ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Home Department Kerala | 64 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 2 | Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare) | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Energy Department Odisha | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Materials Management | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Kiocl Limited | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Revenue Department Andaman & Nicobar | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Higher Education Department Uttar Pradesh | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Sugar Factories Federation Limited | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Coal55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Textiles44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Steel44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Coal | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Textiles | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Steel | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Uttar Pradesh63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Kerala60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Odisha49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Tamil Nadu49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Karnataka40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Madhya Pradesh40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Rajasthan40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8West Bengal40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uttar Pradesh | 63 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 2 | Kerala | 60 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Odisha | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Tamil Nadu | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Karnataka | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Madhya Pradesh | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Rajasthan | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | West Bengal | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Thiruvananthapuram64/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Jharsuguda55/100
Odisha ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Cuddalore55/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Dakshina Kannada44/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Morena44/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Bikaner44/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Azamgarh44/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Jaunpur44/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Jhansi44/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Murshidabad44/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 63
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thiruvananthapuram | 64 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 2 | Jharsuguda | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Cuddalore | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Dakshina Kannada | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Morena | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Bikaner | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Azamgarh | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Jaunpur | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Jhansi | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Murshidabad | 44 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.