Laser Therapy Unit: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Laser Therapy Unit on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 0Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 0
Closed in period: 16
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

0 Mar 2026

4 Apr 2026

1 May 2026

0 Jun 2026

55 Jul 2026

2 Aug 2026

3 Sept 2026

1 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	0
Apr 2026	4
May 2026	1
Jun 2026	0
Jul 2026	5
Aug 2026	2
Sept 2026	3
Oct 2026	1
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 63%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: —
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Laser Therapy Unit73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ultrasound Therapy Unit (V2)52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Laser Therapy Unit	73	0	16	—	—
2	Ultrasound Therapy Unit (V2)	52	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Laser Therapy Unit100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Laser Therapy Unit	100	0	16	—	—

1
Department of Defence63/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Indian Railways63/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Military Affairs58/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Health and Family Welfare Department Kerala58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Sports45/100
Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Central Armed Police Forces38/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Health and Family Welfare Department Chhattisgarh38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Defence	63	4	—	—
2	Indian Railways	63	4	—	—
3	Department of Military Affairs	58	3	—	—
4	Health and Family Welfare Department Kerala	58	1	—	—
5	Department of Sports	45	2	—	—
6	Central Armed Police Forces	38	1	—	—
7	Health and Family Welfare Department Chhattisgarh	38	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Railways56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports41/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Home Affairs35/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
33
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	63	7	—	—
2	Ministry of Railways	56	4	—	—
3	Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports	41	2	—	—
4	Ministry of Home Affairs	35	1	—	—

1
Delhi63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Uttar Pradesh63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Kerala60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Maharashtra49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Manipur49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Puducherry49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Chhattisgarh40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Karnataka40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
West Bengal40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Delhi	63	3	—	—
2	Uttar Pradesh	63	3	—	—
3	Kerala	60	1	—	—
4	Maharashtra	49	2	—	—
5	Manipur	49	2	—	—
6	Puducherry	49	2	—	—
7	Chhattisgarh	40	1	—	—
8	Karnataka	40	1	—	—
9	West Bengal	40	1	—	—

1
Kollam64/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
New Delhi55/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Imphal West55/100
Manipur ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Pondicherry55/100
Puducherry ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Chandauli55/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Bilaspur44/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
South Delhi44/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Dharward44/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Mumbai44/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Pune44/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Kollam	64	1	—	—
2	New Delhi	55	2	—	—
3	Imphal West	55	2	—	—
4	Pondicherry	55	2	—	—
5	Chandauli	55	2	—	—
6	Bilaspur	44	1	—	—
7	South Delhi	44	1	—	—
8	Dharward	44	1	—	—
9	Mumbai	44	1	—	—
10	Pune	44	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Laser Therapy Unit: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor