Laparoscopic Surgery System (V2): GeM business opportunity

Who buys Laparoscopic Surgery System (V2) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 20Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 20
Closed in period: 75
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: 3

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

3 Feb 2026

4 Mar 2026

5 Apr 2026

13 May 2026

4 Jun 2026

9 Jul 2026

16 Aug 2026

14 Sept 2026

2222 Oct 2026

4 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	3
Mar 2026	4
Apr 2026	5
May 2026	13
Jun 2026	4
Jul 2026	9
Aug 2026	16
Sept 2026	14
Oct 2026	22
Nov 2026	4

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 7%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 62%
Reverse auction: 16%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Laparoscopic Surgery System (V2)71/100
20 live · 3 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
93
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Digital Radiography System (V2)32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Arthroscopy System (V2)32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Laparoscopic Surgery System (V2)	71	20	75	3	—
2	Digital Radiography System (V2)	32	0	2	—	—
3	Arthroscopy System (V2)	32	0	2	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Laparoscopic Surgery System (V2)93/100
20 live · 3 bidders avg · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
93
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Laparoscopic Surgery System (V2)	93	20	75	3	—

1
Department of Health and Family Welfare78/100
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare ·8 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
85
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Medical Education Department Uttar Pradesh73/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
81
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
71
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Health Medical Education and Family Welfare Department Jharkhand68/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
60
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Medical Health and Family Welfare Department Uttarakhand64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
79
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Defence63/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Health and Family Welfare Department Delhi57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
81
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Employees State Insuarnce Corporation56/100
Ministry of Labour and Employment ·1 live · 3 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
79
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Urban Development and Urban Housing Department Gujarat56/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
79
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Health and Family Welfare Department West Bengal55/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
59
Momentum
59
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Indian Railways48/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Health and Family Welfare	78	8	1	—	—
2	Medical Education Department Uttar Pradesh	73	3	5	—	—
3	Health Medical Education and Family Welfare Department Jharkhand	68	3	3	—	—
4	Medical Health and Family Welfare Department Uttarakhand	64	0	3	—	—
5	Department of Defence	63	0	14	—	—
6	Health and Family Welfare Department Delhi	57	0	8	—	—
7	Employees State Insuarnce Corporation	56	1	2	3	—
8	Urban Development and Urban Housing Department Gujarat	56	1	2	—	—
9	Health and Family Welfare Department West Bengal	55	1	3	—	—
10	Indian Railways	48	0	3	—	—

1
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare78/100
8 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
85
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Defence63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Labour and Employment61/100
1 live · 3 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
81
Momentum
30
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
86
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Power57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
41
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Coal57/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
41
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Railways48/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Home Affairs37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
41
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Finance33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Pmo33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Health and Family Welfare	78	8	1	—	—
2	Ministry of Defence	63	0	14	—	—
3	Ministry of Labour and Employment	61	1	7	3	—
4	Ministry of Power	57	1	1	—	—
5	Ministry of Coal	57	1	1	—	—
6	Ministry of Railways	48	0	3	—	—
7	Ministry of Home Affairs	37	0	2	—	—
8	Ministry of Finance	33	0	1	—	—
9	Pmo	33	0	1	—	—

1
Jharkhand72/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
75
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Uttar Pradesh71/100
5 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
80
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
63
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Andhra Pradesh69/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Bihar69/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Uttarakhand66/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
80
Momentum
48
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Delhi65/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
13
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Gujarat60/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
69
Momentum
34
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
West Bengal60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
48
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Punjab55/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
46
Momentum
79
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Maharashtra49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Jharkhand	72	4	5	—	—
2	Uttar Pradesh	71	5	5	—	—
3	Andhra Pradesh	69	2	2	—	—
4	Bihar	69	2	2	—	—
5	Uttarakhand	66	0	10	—	—
6	Delhi	65	2	17	—	—
7	Gujarat	60	2	5	—	—
8	West Bengal	60	1	4	—	—
9	Punjab	55	1	2	—	—
10	Maharashtra	49	0	4	—	—

1
Guntur79/100
Andhra Pradesh ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Lucknow76/100
Uttar Pradesh ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
75
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ranchi72/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
48
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Patna64/100
Bihar ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
79
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Surat64/100
Gujarat ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
79
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
New Delhi63/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Central Delhi59/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
East Delhi59/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Mumbai59/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Chandigarh56/100
Chandigarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Guntur	79	2	2	—	—
2	Lucknow	76	2	2	—	—
3	Ranchi	72	0	5	—	—
4	Patna	64	1	2	—	—
5	Surat	64	1	2	—	—
6	New Delhi	63	0	5	—	—
7	Central Delhi	59	0	4	—	—
8	East Delhi	59	0	4	—	—
9	Mumbai	59	0	4	—	—
10	Chandigarh	56	0	3	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Laparoscopic Surgery System (V2): GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor