Hopper Tipper Dumper for Garbage: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Hopper Tipper Dumper for Garbage on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 31Awarded results: 13Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 31
Closed in period: 570
Awarded results: 13
Median winning price (L1): ₹16 lakh
Avg bidders per bid: 4.3

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

1 Jan 2026

1 Feb 2026

37 Mar 2026

82 Apr 2026

9696 May 2026

75 Jun 2026

80 Jul 2026

75 Aug 2026

76 Sept 2026

59 Oct 2026

19 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	1
Feb 2026	1
Mar 2026	37
Apr 2026	82
May 2026	96
Jun 2026	75
Jul 2026	80
Aug 2026	75
Sept 2026	76
Oct 2026	59
Nov 2026	19

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 12%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 9%
Reverse auction: 2%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Hopper Tipper Dumper for Garbage85/100
31 live · 4.3 bidders avg · L1 ₹16 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
82
Easy criteria
97
Order value
100
2
E-cart for Goods28/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
11
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Tractors (V1)28/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
11
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Hopper Tipper Dumper for Garbage	85	31	570	4.3	₹16 lakh
2	E-cart for Goods	28	0	1	—	—
3	Tractors (V1)	28	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Hopper Tipper Dumper for Garbage87/100
31 live · 4.3 bidders avg · L1 ₹16 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
82
Easy criteria
97
Order value
100

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Hopper Tipper Dumper for Garbage	87	31	570	4.3	₹16 lakh

1
Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh85/100
10 live · 3.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹21 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
40
Low competition
88
Easy criteria
98
Order value
100
2
Panchayat and Rural Development Department Madhya Pradesh76/100
4 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹9.8 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
100
Low competition
92
Easy criteria
64
Order value
95
3
Urban Development and Town and Country Planning Department West Bengal67/100
5 live · 4 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
93
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Urban Development Department Chhattisgarh65/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
64
Momentum
67
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Urban Administration and Development64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
90
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Urban Development & Housing Department Bihar58/100
0 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹7.1 crore
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
55
Momentum
45
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Urban Development Department Assam56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
40
Momentum
55
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Urban Development Directorate of Uttarakhand54/100
1 live · 7 bidders avg · L1 ₹15 crore
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
62
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
86
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Department of Panchayati Raj53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
25
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Urban Development Department52/100
2 live · 12 bidders avg · L1 ₹1.7 crore
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Urban Development Department Uttar Pradesh	85	10	284	3.5	₹21 lakh
2	Panchayat and Rural Development Department Madhya Pradesh	76	4	10	3	₹9.8 lakh
3	Urban Development and Town and Country Planning Department West Bengal	67	5	14	4	—
4	Urban Development Department Chhattisgarh	65	1	36	—	—
5	Urban Administration and Development	64	0	11	—	—
6	Urban Development & Housing Department Bihar	58	0	22	3	₹7.1 crore
7	Urban Development Department Assam	56	0	9	—	—
8	Urban Development Directorate of Uttarakhand	54	1	7	7	₹15 crore
9	Department of Panchayati Raj	53	0	20	—	—
10	Urban Development Department	52	2	1	12	₹1.7 crore

1
Ministry of Urban Development83/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Defence38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Power38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Steel38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Urban Development	83	4	—	—
2	Ministry of Defence	38	1	—	—
3	Ministry of Power	38	1	—	—
4	Ministry of Steel	38	1	—	—

1
Uttar Pradesh70/100
11 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
42
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
97
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Chhattisgarh68/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
71
Momentum
70
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
West Bengal67/100
5 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
93
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Madhya Pradesh64/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
86
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
83
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Uttarakhand63/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
40
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
89
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Punjab63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
34
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Bihar62/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
57
Momentum
62
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Maharashtra60/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
64
Momentum
39
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Tamil Nadu60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Goa55/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
49
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Uttar Pradesh	70	11	285	—	—
2	Chhattisgarh	68	1	55	—	—
3	West Bengal	67	5	12	—	—
4	Madhya Pradesh	64	4	19	—	—
5	Uttarakhand	63	2	7	—	—
6	Punjab	63	0	6	—	—
7	Bihar	62	1	23	—	—
8	Maharashtra	60	3	35	—	—
9	Tamil Nadu	60	0	3	—	—
10	Goa	55	1	9	—	—

1
Durg78/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
85
Momentum
99
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Gorakhpur76/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
91
Momentum
82
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ghaziabad76/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Darjeeling76/100
West Bengal ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Maharajganj75/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Bilaspur73/100
Chhattisgarh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
69
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Moradabad70/100
Uttar Pradesh ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
71
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Muzaffarnagar70/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
69
Momentum
82
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Janjgir-champa70/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
57
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Jalaun70/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
57
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Durg	78	0	10	—	—
2	Gorakhpur	76	1	11	—	—
3	Ghaziabad	76	0	8	—	—
4	Darjeeling	76	2	6	—	—
5	Maharajganj	75	0	7	—	—
6	Bilaspur	73	1	5	—	—
7	Moradabad	70	2	5	—	—
8	Muzaffarnagar	70	0	6	—	—
9	Janjgir-champa	70	0	4	—	—
10	Jalaun	70	0	4	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

3 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins

11 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Hopper Tipper Dumper for Garbage: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor