Hiring of Professionals for Cloud, Network and Security: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Hiring of Professionals for Cloud, Network and Security on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 3
- Closed in period
- 37
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- —
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 3 |
| Apr 2026 | 6 |
| May 2026 | 2 |
| Jun 2026 | 9 |
| Jul 2026 | 3 |
| Aug 2026 | 7 |
| Sept 2026 | 4 |
| Oct 2026 | 5 |
| Nov 2026 | 1 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 41%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 100%
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 39 bids
based on 1 bids
based on 38 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hiring of Professionals for Cloud, Network and Security | 73 | 3 | 37 | — | — |
| 2 | Light Weight Running Shoes (V3) (MHA) | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
3 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hiring of Professionals for Cloud, Network and Security | 100 | 3 | 37 | — | — |
- 1
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
Ministry of Finance ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
Ministry of Finance ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
Ministry of Education ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
Ministry of Finance ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 67
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Department of Defence39/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
Ministry of Education ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Electronics and Information Technology | 73 | 1 | 9 | — | — |
| 2 | Department of Investment and Public Asset Management | 59 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Department of Economic Affairs | 59 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Department of Higher Education | 54 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of Financial Services | 53 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 6 | Department of Defence | 39 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Department of Defence Research & Development | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Department of Military Affairs | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Department of School Education and Literacy | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Indian Oil Corporation Limited | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Finance80/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 92
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Education59/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Defence55/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 75
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Ministry of Mines50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 58
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Ministry of Home Affairs34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Ministry of Power34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Finance | 80 | 1 | 7 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology | 73 | 1 | 9 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Education | 59 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Defence | 55 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Mines | 50 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Ministry of Science and Technology | 39 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Ministry of Health and Family Welfare | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Ministry of Home Affairs | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Ministry of Power | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs (mohua) | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Delhi74/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 59
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Telangana59/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 48
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Maharashtra53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 67
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Uttarakhand52/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5West Bengal49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Madhya Pradesh36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 38
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Puducherry36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 38
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Andhra Pradesh32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Assam32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Bihar32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Delhi | 74 | 1 | 16 | — | — |
| 2 | Telangana | 59 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Maharashtra | 53 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 4 | Uttarakhand | 52 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 5 | West Bengal | 49 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 6 | Madhya Pradesh | 36 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Puducherry | 36 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Andhra Pradesh | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Assam | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Bihar | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1New Delhi75/100
Delhi ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 63
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Central Delhi75/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 95
- Momentum
- 71
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Mumbai54/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 73
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Udham Singh Nagar54/100
Uttarakhand ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Pondicherry40/100
Puducherry ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Kolkata40/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7North 24 Parganas40/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Visakhapatnam34/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Dibrugarh34/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Patna34/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Delhi | 75 | 1 | 7 | — | — |
| 2 | Central Delhi | 75 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 3 | Mumbai | 54 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 4 | Udham Singh Nagar | 54 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 5 | Pondicherry | 40 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Kolkata | 40 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | North 24 Parganas | 40 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Visakhapatnam | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Dibrugarh | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Patna | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.