Hiring of Agency for IT Projects- Milestone basis: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Hiring of Agency for IT Projects- Milestone basis on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 167Awarded results: 10Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 167
Closed in period: 910
Awarded results: 10
Median winning price (L1): ₹22 lakh
Avg bidders per bid: 3.3

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

3 Dec 2025

4 Jan 2026

16 Feb 2026

55 Mar 2026

91 Apr 2026

79 May 2026

141 Jun 2026

164 Jul 2026

145 Aug 2026

155 Sept 2026

169169 Oct 2026

54 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	3
Jan 2026	4
Feb 2026	16
Mar 2026	55
Apr 2026	91
May 2026	79
Jun 2026	141
Jul 2026	164
Aug 2026	145
Sept 2026	155
Oct 2026	169
Nov 2026	54

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 20%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 24%
Reverse auction: 5%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Hiring of Agency for IT Projects- Milestone basis86/100
167 live · 3.3 bidders avg · L1 ₹22 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
90
Easy criteria
91
Order value
100

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Hiring of Agency for IT Projects- Milestone basis	86	167	910	3.3	₹22 lakh

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Hiring of Agency for IT Projects- Milestone basis90/100
167 live · 3.3 bidders avg · L1 ₹22 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
90
Easy criteria
91
Order value
100

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Hiring of Agency for IT Projects- Milestone basis	90	167	910	3.3	₹22 lakh

1
Department of Financial Services82/100
Ministry of Finance ·48 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹22 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
39
Low competition
85
Easy criteria
90
Order value
100
2
Information Technology and Electronics Department Uttar Pradesh70/100
20 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
86
Momentum
72
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
84
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Gail India Limited62/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
45
Momentum
79
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Health and Family Welfare62/100
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare ·5 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
83
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Food and Public Distribution62/100
Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
35
Momentum
97
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Health and Family Welfare Department Delhi62/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Vocational Education and Skill Development Department Uttar Pradesh61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
29
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of Telecommunications (dot)60/100
Ministry of Communications ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
60
Momentum
52
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
96
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Cooperative Department Uttar Pradesh60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
25
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Higher and Techical Education Department Jharkhand59/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
80
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Financial Services	82	48	214	4	₹22 lakh
2	Information Technology and Electronics Department Uttar Pradesh	70	20	97	—	—
3	Gail India Limited	62	3	8	—	—
4	Department of Health and Family Welfare	62	5	3	—	—
5	Department of Food and Public Distribution	62	1	5	—	—
6	Health and Family Welfare Department Delhi	62	2	3	—	—
7	Vocational Education and Skill Development Department Uttar Pradesh	61	0	4	—	—
8	Department of Telecommunications (dot)	60	2	26	—	—
9	Cooperative Department Uttar Pradesh	60	0	3	—	—
10	Higher and Techical Education Department Jharkhand	59	1	4	—	—

1
Ministry of Finance82/100
54 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹22 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
40
Low competition
85
Easy criteria
89
Order value
100
2
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare63/100
6 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
41
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
86
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Power61/100
6 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
56
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
90
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Defence60/100
4 live · 7 bidders avg · L1 ₹5.5 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
28
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
97
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Communications60/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
66
Momentum
42
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
98
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution60/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
37
Momentum
83
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas59/100
6 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
33
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
98
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Education59/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
47
Momentum
67
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
92
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Science and Technology59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
97
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ministry of Commerce and Industry56/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
62
Momentum
27
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
97
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Finance	82	54	236	4	₹22 lakh
2	Ministry of Health and Family Welfare	63	6	3	—	—
3	Ministry of Power	61	6	25	—	—
4	Ministry of Defence	60	4	58	7	₹5.5 lakh
5	Ministry of Communications	60	3	39	—	—
6	Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution	60	1	6	—	—
7	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	59	6	38	—	—
8	Ministry of Education	59	1	12	—	—
9	Ministry of Science and Technology	59	0	3	—	—
10	Ministry of Commerce and Industry	56	2	30	—	—

1
Uttar Pradesh73/100
28 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
96
Momentum
66
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
89
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Delhi70/100
36 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
42
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
92
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Maharashtra68/100
32 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹40 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
95
Momentum
45
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
86
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
West Bengal67/100
6 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
97
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Madhya Pradesh66/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
93
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Gujarat65/100
13 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
69
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
90
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Karnataka64/100
12 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
40
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
99
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Assam63/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
57
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Tamil Nadu62/100
13 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
43
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
88
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Jammu & Kashmir60/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
87
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
78
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Uttar Pradesh	73	28	169	—	—
2	Delhi	70	36	213	—	—
3	Maharashtra	68	32	155	3	₹40 lakh
4	West Bengal	67	6	9	—	—
5	Madhya Pradesh	66	4	11	—	—
6	Gujarat	65	13	29	—	—
7	Karnataka	64	12	60	—	—
8	Assam	63	2	34	—	—
9	Tamil Nadu	62	13	55	—	—
10	Jammu & Kashmir	60	2	8	—	—

1
Lucknow75/100
Uttar Pradesh ·23 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
76
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
85
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Mumbai69/100
Maharashtra ·16 live · 3 bidders avg · L1 ₹40 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
37
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
92
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Kolkata67/100
West Bengal ·5 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
97
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ahmedabad66/100
Gujarat ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
46
Momentum
97
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Central Delhi65/100
Delhi ·9 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
93
Momentum
29
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
94
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Chennai65/100
Tamil Nadu ·13 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
85
Momentum
43
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
88
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
South West Delhi65/100
Delhi ·10 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
81
Momentum
48
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
89
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Kamrup65/100
Assam ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
65
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Bangalore64/100
Karnataka ·10 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
82
Momentum
35
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Gautam Buddha Nagar64/100
Uttar Pradesh ·4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
65
Momentum
58
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Lucknow	75	23	123	—	—
2	Mumbai	69	16	127	3	₹40 lakh
3	Kolkata	67	5	7	—	—
4	Ahmedabad	66	3	6	—	—
5	Central Delhi	65	9	93	—	—
6	Chennai	65	13	54	—	—
7	South West Delhi	65	10	45	—	—
8	Kamrup	65	1	26	—	—
9	Bangalore	64	10	48	—	—
10	Gautam Buddha Nagar	64	4	21	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

2 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins

8 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

Bids won by MSE sellers100%

of 4 awarded bids with the MSE flag

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Hiring of Agency for IT Projects- Milestone basis: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor