Hemodialysis Machine with SLED and HDF: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Hemodialysis Machine with SLED and HDF on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 1Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 1
Closed in period: 12
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

1 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

0 Mar 2026

1 Apr 2026

0 May 2026

0 Jun 2026

3 Jul 2026

44 Aug 2026

3 Sept 2026

0 Oct 2026

1 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	1
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	0
Apr 2026	1
May 2026	0
Jun 2026	0
Jul 2026	3
Aug 2026	4
Sept 2026	3
Oct 2026	0
Nov 2026	1

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 25%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: —
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Hemodialysis Machine with SLED and HDF73/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Hemodialysis Machine37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Hemodialysis Machine with SLED and HDF	73	1	12	—	—
2	Hemodialysis Machine	37	0	2	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Hemodialysis Machine with SLED and HDF100/100
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Hemodialysis Machine with SLED and HDF	100	1	12	—	—

1
Medical Education Department Uttar Pradesh69/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Defence63/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Science and Technology (dst)49/100
Ministry of Science and Technology ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Higher Education40/100
Ministry of Education ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Atomic Energy40/100
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Moil Limited40/100
Ministry of Steel ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Health and Family Welfare Services Department Puducherry40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Medical Education Department Uttar Pradesh	69	1	1	—	—
2	Department of Defence	63	0	3	—	—
3	Department of Science and Technology (dst)	49	0	2	—	—
4	Department of Higher Education	40	0	1	—	—
5	Department of Atomic Energy	40	0	1	—	—
6	Moil Limited	40	0	1	—	—
7	Health and Family Welfare Services Department Puducherry	40	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Labour and Employment49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Science and Technology49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Education40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Pmo40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Steel40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	63	3	—	—
2	Ministry of Labour and Employment	49	2	—	—
3	Ministry of Science and Technology	49	2	—	—
4	Ministry of Education	40	1	—	—
5	Pmo	40	1	—	—
6	Ministry of Steel	40	1	—	—

1
Uttar Pradesh75/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Kerala49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Madhya Pradesh49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Maharashtra49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
West Bengal49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Andhra Pradesh40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Puducherry40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Uttar Pradesh	75	1	2	—	—
2	Kerala	49	0	2	—	—
3	Madhya Pradesh	49	0	2	—	—
4	Maharashtra	49	0	2	—	—
5	West Bengal	49	0	2	—	—
6	Andhra Pradesh	40	0	1	—	—
7	Puducherry	40	0	1	—	—

1
Shahjahanpur64/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Thiruvananthapuram55/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Indore55/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Nadia55/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Guntur44/100
Andhra Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Mumbai44/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Nagpur44/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Pondicherry44/100
Puducherry ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Lucknow44/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Varanasi44/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Shahjahanpur	64	1	0	—	—
2	Thiruvananthapuram	55	0	2	—	—
3	Indore	55	0	2	—	—
4	Nadia	55	0	2	—	—
5	Guntur	44	0	1	—	—
6	Mumbai	44	0	1	—	—
7	Nagpur	44	0	1	—	—
8	Pondicherry	44	0	1	—	—
9	Lucknow	44	0	1	—	—
10	Varanasi	44	0	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Hemodialysis Machine with SLED and HDF: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor