Healthcare Sanitation Service: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Healthcare Sanitation Service on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 1Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 1
Closed in period: 26
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: 1

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

2 Mar 2026

66 Apr 2026

3 May 2026

3 Jun 2026

2 Jul 2026

5 Aug 2026

2 Sept 2026

4 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	2
Apr 2026	6
May 2026	3
Jun 2026	3
Jul 2026	2
Aug 2026	5
Sept 2026	2
Oct 2026	4
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 15%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 0%
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Healthcare Sanitation Service72/100
1 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
96
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Healthcare Kitchen and Dietary Service31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
21
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Healthcare Sanitation Service	72	1	26	1	—
2	Healthcare Kitchen and Dietary Service	31	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Healthcare Sanitation Service96/100
1 live · 1 bidders avg · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
96
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Healthcare Sanitation Service	96	1	26	1	—

1
Health and Family Welfare Department Delhi74/100
0 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
56
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Atomic Energy52/100
Pmo ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Defence47/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
49
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Indian Railways37/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Defence Production32/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Public Health and Family Welfare Department Maharashtra32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Social Justice and Special Assistance Department Maharashtra32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Health and Family Welfare Department Delhi	74	0	16	1	—
2	Department of Atomic Energy	52	1	0	—	—
3	Department of Defence	47	0	3	—	—
4	Indian Railways	37	0	2	—	—
5	Department of Defence Production	32	0	1	—	—
6	Public Health and Family Welfare Department Maharashtra	32	0	1	—	—
7	Social Justice and Special Assistance Department Maharashtra	32	0	1	—	—
8	Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences	32	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Pmo58/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Railways45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Labour and Employment38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	63	0	4	—	—
2	Pmo	58	1	0	—	—
3	Ministry of Railways	45	0	2	—	—
4	Ministry of Labour and Employment	38	0	1	—	—

1
Delhi73/100
0 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
53
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Maharashtra65/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
75
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
West Bengal36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
38
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Gujarat32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Madhya Pradesh32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Mizoram32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Rajasthan32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Delhi	73	0	17	1	—
2	Maharashtra	65	1	3	—	—
3	West Bengal	36	0	2	—	—
4	Gujarat	32	0	1	—	—
5	Madhya Pradesh	32	0	1	—	—
6	Mizoram	32	0	1	—	—
7	Rajasthan	32	0	1	—	—

1
South Delhi81/100
Delhi ·0 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
90
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
North West Delhi79/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Mumbai63/100
Maharashtra ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Central Delhi59/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
West Delhi56/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Bankura43/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
East Delhi37/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Bharuch37/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Jabalpur37/100
Madhya Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Akola37/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	South Delhi	81	0	5	1	—
2	North West Delhi	79	0	4	—	—
3	Mumbai	63	1	1	—	—
4	Central Delhi	59	0	4	—	—
5	West Delhi	56	0	3	—	—
6	Bankura	43	0	2	—	—
7	East Delhi	37	0	1	—	—
8	Bharuch	37	0	1	—	—
9	Jabalpur	37	0	1	—	—
10	Akola	37	0	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Healthcare Sanitation Service: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor