GNSS RECEIVER FOR REFERENCE STATION: GeM business opportunity
Who buys GNSS RECEIVER FOR REFERENCE STATION on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 0
- Closed in period
- 29
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- —
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 3 |
| Apr 2026 | 2 |
| May 2026 | 0 |
| Jun 2026 | 2 |
| Jul 2026 | 4 |
| Aug 2026 | 7 |
| Sept 2026 | 5 |
| Oct 2026 | 6 |
| Nov 2026 | 0 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 70%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- —
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 27 bids
based on 0 bids
based on 27 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2electronic total station35/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GNSS RECEIVER FOR REFERENCE STATION | 73 | 0 | 29 | — | — |
| 2 | electronic total station | 35 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Controller for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GNSS RECEIVER FOR REFERENCE STATION | 100 | 0 | 29 | — | — |
- 1Public Works Department70/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 58
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
Ministry of Education ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Department of Space55/100
Department of Space ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 75
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 46
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 29
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Public Works Department | 70 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 2 | Panchayat Raj Department Bihar | 63 | 0 | 10 | — | — |
| 3 | Department of Higher Education | 59 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Department of Space | 55 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of Military Affairs | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Technical Education Training and Skill Development Department West Bengal | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Public Works Department Jammu and Kashmir | 39 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Local Administration Department Puducherry | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Rural Development Department Bihar | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Rural Development Department Himachal Pradesh | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Department of Space63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Education63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Defence57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Space | 63 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Education | 63 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Defence | 57 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Jammu & Kashmir68/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 60
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Bihar63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Gujarat58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 44
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Jharkhand53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5West Bengal53/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Karnataka52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Haryana33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Manipur33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Puducherry33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Punjab33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jammu & Kashmir | 68 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 2 | Bihar | 63 | 0 | 11 | — | — |
| 3 | Gujarat | 58 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Jharkhand | 53 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | West Bengal | 53 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Karnataka | 52 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 7 | Haryana | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Manipur | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Puducherry | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Punjab | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Katihar63/100
Bihar ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Leh58/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 44
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Kachchh53/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4East Singhbhum53/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Bardhaman53/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Kargil52/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Bangalore52/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Ahmedabad33/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Kurukshetra33/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Imphal West33/100
Manipur ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Katihar | 63 | 0 | 11 | — | — |
| 2 | Leh | 58 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Kachchh | 53 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | East Singhbhum | 53 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Bardhaman | 53 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Kargil | 52 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 7 | Bangalore | 52 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 8 | Ahmedabad | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Kurukshetra | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Imphal West | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.