Foley's Rubber Catheter (for Prolonged Urinary Drainage) Conforming to IS 11497: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Foley's Rubber Catheter (for Prolonged Urinary Drainage) Conforming to IS 11497 on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 2
- Closed in period
- 34
- Awarded results
- 1
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹60 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 14
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 2 |
| Apr 2026 | 1 |
| May 2026 | 2 |
| Jun 2026 | 5 |
| Jul 2026 | 7 |
| Aug 2026 | 4 |
| Sept 2026 | 9 |
| Oct 2026 | 5 |
| Nov 2026 | 1 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 84%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 50%
- Reverse auction
- 3%
based on 32 bids
based on 2 bids
based on 33 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
2 live · 14 bidders avg · L1 ₹60 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Surgical Sutures44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 38
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Nasogastric Tube (V2)31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foley's Rubber Catheter (for Prolonged Urinary Drainage) Conforming to IS 11497 | 73 | 2 | 34 | 14 | ₹60 lakh |
| 2 | Surgical Sutures | 44 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Nasogastric Tube (V2) | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Permeable Nonwoven Surgical Adhesive Tape Conforming to IS 16948 | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
2 live · 14 bidders avg · L1 ₹60 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Surgical Sutures100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 38
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foley's Rubber Catheter (for Prolonged Urinary Drainage) Conforming to IS 11497 | 100 | 2 | 34 | 14 | ₹60 lakh |
| 2 | Surgical Sutures | 100 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
- 1Indian Railways71/100
Ministry of Railways ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 40
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 70
- Momentum
- 90
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
Ministry of Labour and Employment ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Department of Defence51/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 60
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 48
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare ·0 live · 14 bidders avg · L1 ₹60 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
Ministry of Education ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
Ministry of Science and Technology ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Indian Railways | 71 | 1 | 8 | — | — |
| 2 | Department of Military Affairs | 71 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 3 | Medical Education Department Uttar Pradesh | 71 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Employees State Insuarnce Corporation | 54 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Department of Defence | 51 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Medical Education and Drugs Department Maharashtra | 39 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Department of Health and Family Welfare | 34 | 0 | 1 | 14 | ₹60 lakh |
| 8 | Department of Higher Education | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Department of Heavy Industry | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Department of Science and Technology (dst) | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 95
- Momentum
- 90
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Railways71/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 40
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Defence70/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 51
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live · 14 bidders avg · L1 ₹60 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Ministry of Education34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Labour and Employment | 79 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Railways | 71 | 1 | 8 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Defence | 70 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Health and Family Welfare | 34 | 0 | 1 | 14 | ₹60 lakh |
| 5 | Ministry of Education | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Ministry of Science and Technology | 34 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Uttar Pradesh77/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 72
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2West Bengal77/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 72
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Rajasthan63/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Telangana63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Karnataka59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Punjab59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Haryana57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Kerala56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Maharashtra56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Delhi43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 61
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uttar Pradesh | 77 | 1 | 4 | — | — |
| 2 | West Bengal | 77 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 3 | Rajasthan | 63 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 4 | Telangana | 63 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Karnataka | 59 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 6 | Punjab | 59 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 7 | Haryana | 57 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Kerala | 56 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 9 | Maharashtra | 56 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 10 | Delhi | 43 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Ajmer65/100
Rajasthan ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Bardhaman63/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Bangalore58/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Hingoli58/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Faridabad58/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Hyderabad58/100
Telangana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Lucknow58/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Darjeeling58/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 43
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Kollam45/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Jalandhar45/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 68
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ajmer | 65 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 2 | Bardhaman | 63 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 3 | Bangalore | 58 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Hingoli | 58 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Faridabad | 58 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Hyderabad | 58 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Lucknow | 58 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 8 | Darjeeling | 58 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Kollam | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Jalandhar | 45 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
1 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesAI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.