Dry Fruits and Nuts: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Dry Fruits and Nuts on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 5Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 5
Closed in period: 102
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: 4.7

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

1 Mar 2026

4 Apr 2026

18 May 2026

14 Jun 2026

2323 Jul 2026

14 Aug 2026

12 Sept 2026

21 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	1
Apr 2026	4
May 2026	18
Jun 2026	14
Jul 2026	23
Aug 2026	14
Sept 2026	12
Oct 2026	21
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 54%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 100%
Reverse auction: 5%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Dry Fruits and Nuts80/100
5 live · 4.7 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
79
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Turmeric Bathing and Beauty Products from Sangli - ODOP29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Dry Fruits and Nuts	80	5	102	4.7	—
2	Turmeric Bathing and Beauty Products from Sangli - ODOP	29	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Dry Fruits and Nuts85/100
5 live · 4.7 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
79
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Dry Fruits and Nuts	85	5	102	4.7	—

1
Department of Military Affairs71/100
Ministry of Defence ·5 live · 6.5 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
42
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Balmer Lawrie and Company Limited52/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Electronics and Information Technology49/100
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology ·0 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Food and Public Distribution49/100
Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Defence Production29/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
India Tourism Development Corporation Limited29/100
Ministry of Tourism ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	71	5	96	6.5	—
2	Balmer Lawrie and Company Limited	52	0	2	—	—
3	Department of Electronics and Information Technology	49	0	1	1	—
4	Department of Food and Public Distribution	49	0	1	—	—
5	Department of Defence Production	29	0	1	—	—
6	India Tourism Development Corporation Limited	29	0	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence71/100
5 live · 6.5 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
42
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology49/100
0 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Tourism29/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
15
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	71	5	97	6.5	—
2	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	52	0	2	—	—
3	Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology	49	0	1	1	—
4	Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution	49	0	1	—	—
5	Ministry of Tourism	29	0	1	—	—

1
Arunachal Pradesh76/100
5 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
65
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Jammu & Kashmir61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
94
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Sikkim56/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
36
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Gujarat50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
18
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Maharashtra50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
18
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
West Bengal50/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
18
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Kerala47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
47
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Assam45/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Haryana34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
29
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Karnataka34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
29
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Arunachal Pradesh	76	5	40	—	—
2	Jammu & Kashmir	61	0	36	—	—
3	Sikkim	56	0	3	—	—
4	Gujarat	50	0	1	—	—
5	Maharashtra	50	0	1	—	—
6	West Bengal	50	0	1	—	—
7	Kerala	47	0	5	—	—
8	Assam	45	0	4	—	—
9	Haryana	34	0	2	—	—
10	Karnataka	34	0	2	—	—

1
West Kameng77/100
Arunachal Pradesh ·5 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
74
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ananthnag60/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
91
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
East Sikkim57/100
Sikkim ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
38
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Tawang54/100
Arunachal Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Srinagar52/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
64
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ahmedabad51/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Raigad51/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Kolkata51/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
19
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Lohit50/100
Arunachal Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
58
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ernakulam47/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	West Kameng	77	5	31	—	—
2	Ananthnag	60	0	26	—	—
3	East Sikkim	57	0	3	—	—
4	Tawang	54	0	2	—	—
5	Srinagar	52	0	9	—	—
6	Ahmedabad	51	0	1	—	—
7	Raigad	51	0	1	—	—
8	Kolkata	51	0	1	—	—
9	Lohit	50	0	7	—	—
10	Ernakulam	47	0	5	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Dry Fruits and Nuts: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor