Covers Waterproof (Defence): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Covers Waterproof (Defence) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-09 – 2026-11-09 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 4
- Closed in period
- 31
- Awarded results
- 1
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹24 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 11
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 1 |
| May 2026 | 4 |
| Jun 2026 | 3 |
| Jul 2026 | 2 |
| Aug 2026 | 5 |
| Sept 2026 | 9 |
| Oct 2026 | 10 |
| Nov 2026 | 1 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 68%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 50%
- Reverse auction
- 6%
based on 34 bids
based on 2 bids
based on 34 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
4 live · 11 bidders avg · L1 ₹24 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 97
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Covers Waterproof (Defence) | 72 | 4 | 31 | 11 | ₹24 lakh |
| 2 | Lead Acid Storage Batteries For Motor Vehicles with Light Weight and High Cranking Performance (V2) Conforming to IS 14257 | 51 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 3 | Tent Extendable Frame Supported 4M and 2M Complete with Accessories (V2) | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
4 live · 11 bidders avg · L1 ₹24 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 97
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Covers Waterproof (Defence) | 97 | 4 | 31 | 11 | ₹24 lakh |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·3 live · 11 bidders avg · L1 ₹24 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 43
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 97
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
Ministry of Defence ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 19
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 71 | 3 | 31 | 11 | ₹24 lakh |
| 2 | Department of Defence Research & Development | 51 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence72/100
4 live · 11 bidders avg · L1 ₹24 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 97
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 72 | 4 | 31 | 11 | ₹24 lakh |
- 1Uttar Pradesh72/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 53
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 91
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Maharashtra67/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 73
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Rajasthan66/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 84
- Momentum
- 42
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Punjab58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 44
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Andhra Pradesh53/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Jammu & Kashmir49/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7West Bengal38/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 44
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Gujarat33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Karnataka33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Madhya Pradesh33/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 28
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uttar Pradesh | 72 | 2 | 9 | — | — |
| 2 | Maharashtra | 67 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 3 | Rajasthan | 66 | 1 | 6 | — | — |
| 4 | Punjab | 58 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Andhra Pradesh | 53 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 6 | Jammu & Kashmir | 49 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 7 | West Bengal | 38 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Gujarat | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Karnataka | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Madhya Pradesh | 33 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Jodhpur72/100
Rajasthan ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 49
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Kanpur Nagar68/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 83
- Momentum
- 73
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 75
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Nashik62/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Bareilly62/100
Uttar Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Visakhapatnam56/100
Andhra Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Gurdaspur56/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Allahabad54/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Kupwara42/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Jhansi42/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Jalpaiguri42/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jodhpur | 72 | 1 | 5 | — | — |
| 2 | Kanpur Nagar | 68 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 3 | Nashik | 62 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Bareilly | 62 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 5 | Visakhapatnam | 56 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 6 | Gurdaspur | 56 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Allahabad | 54 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 8 | Kupwara | 42 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | Jhansi | 42 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Jalpaiguri | 42 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
1 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesAI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.