Centrifugal Pump With Diesel Engine For Fire Water Service as per IOCL Specifications: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Centrifugal Pump With Diesel Engine For Fire Water Service as per IOCL Specifications on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 0Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 0
Closed in period: 18
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

2 Mar 2026

2 Apr 2026

1 May 2026

4 Jun 2026

55 Jul 2026

3 Aug 2026

0 Sept 2026

1 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	2
Apr 2026	2
May 2026	1
Jun 2026	4
Jul 2026	5
Aug 2026	3
Sept 2026	0
Oct 2026	1
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 83%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: —
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Centrifugal Pump With Diesel Engine For Fire Water Service as per IOCL Specifications73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Vertical Pulsating High Gradient Magnetic Separator32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Centrifugal Pump With Diesel Engine For Fire Water Service as per IOCL Specifications	73	0	18	—	—
2	Vertical Pulsating High Gradient Magnetic Separator	32	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Centrifugal Pump With Diesel Engine For Fire Water Service as per IOCL Specifications100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Centrifugal Pump With Diesel Engine For Fire Water Service as per IOCL Specifications	100	0	18	—	—

1
Steel Authority of India Limited63/100
Ministry of Steel ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Defence Production60/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Heavy Industry40/100
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Military Affairs34/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Fertilizers34/100
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd34/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Contracts and Materials34/100
Ministry of Power ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Coal India Limited34/100
Ministry of Coal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Materials34/100
Ministry of Mines ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Steel Authority of India Limited	63	8	—	—
2	Department of Defence Production	60	2	—	—
3	Department of Heavy Industry	40	2	—	—
4	Department of Military Affairs	34	1	—	—
5	Department of Fertilizers	34	1	—	—
6	Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd	34	1	—	—
7	Contracts and Materials	34	1	—	—
8	Coal India Limited	34	1	—	—
9	Materials	34	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence71/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Steel63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Power34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Coal34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Mines34/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	71	3	—	—
2	Ministry of Steel	63	8	—	—
3	Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises	40	2	—	—
4	Ministry of Power	34	1	—	—
5	Ministry of Coal	34	1	—	—
6	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	34	1	—	—
7	Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers	34	1	—	—
8	Ministry of Mines	34	1	—	—

1
Jharkhand63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Maharashtra63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Odisha59/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Uttar Pradesh43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
West Bengal43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Goa37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Tamil Nadu37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Uttarakhand37/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
39
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Jharkhand	63	5	—	—
2	Maharashtra	63	2	—	—
3	Odisha	59	4	—	—
4	Uttar Pradesh	43	2	—	—
5	West Bengal	43	2	—	—
6	Goa	37	1	—	—
7	Tamil Nadu	37	1	—	—
8	Uttarakhand	37	1	—	—

1
Bokaro63/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Sundergarh63/100
Odisha ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Bhandara60/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Bardhaman49/100
West Bengal ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
South Goa40/100
Goa ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Koderma40/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ranchi40/100
Jharkhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Chandrapur40/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Angul40/100
Odisha ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Tiruvallur40/100
Tamil Nadu ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
50
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Bokaro	63	3	—	—
2	Sundergarh	63	3	—	—
3	Bhandara	60	1	—	—
4	Bardhaman	49	2	—	—
5	South Goa	40	1	—	—
6	Koderma	40	1	—	—
7	Ranchi	40	1	—	—
8	Chandrapur	40	1	—	—
9	Angul	40	1	—	—
10	Tiruvallur	40	1	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Centrifugal Pump With Diesel Engine For Fire Water Service as per IOCL Specifications: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor