Catering service (Event Based): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Catering service (Event Based) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 45
- Closed in period
- 603
- Awarded results
- 23
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹15 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 4.3
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 25 |
| Apr 2026 | 72 |
| May 2026 | 71 |
| Jun 2026 | 101 |
| Jul 2026 | 68 |
| Aug 2026 | 85 |
| Sept 2026 | 89 |
| Oct 2026 | 115 |
| Nov 2026 | 22 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 58%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 43%
- Reverse auction
- 1%
based on 586 bids
based on 21 bids
based on 577 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
45 live · 4.3 bidders avg · L1 ₹15 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 82
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value
- 100
- 2Catering Service50/100
0 live · 2 bidders avg · L1 ₹94,788
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 21
- Momentum
- 93
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 11
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Catering service (Event Based) | 85 | 45 | 603 | 4.3 | ₹15 lakh |
| 2 | Catering Service | 50 | 0 | 3 | 2 | ₹94,788 |
| 3 | Catering Service per Packet based | 43 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
| 4 | Canteen Service - Best Price on Fixed Menu Rate Model | 28 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
45 live · 4.3 bidders avg · L1 ₹15 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition
- 82
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value
- 100
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Catering Service per Packet based | 100 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
| 2 | Catering service (Event Based) | 87 | 45 | 603 | 4.3 | ₹15 lakh |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·15 live · 3.9 bidders avg · L1 ₹17 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 69
- Low competition
- 86
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value
- 100
- 2
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 53
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
Ministry of Education ·4 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹17 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 51
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Department of Defence65/100
Ministry of Defence ·2 live · 1 bidders avg · L1 ₹8.8 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 81
- Momentum
- 42
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 52
- Momentum
- 86
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
3 live · 11 bidders avg · L1 ₹3.1 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 73
- Momentum
- 43
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 27
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 77
- Momentum
- 23
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 90 | 15 | 143 | 3.9 | ₹17 lakh |
| 2 | Department of Defence Production | 69 | 0 | 14 | — | — |
| 3 | Department of Higher Education | 68 | 4 | 8 | 4 | ₹17 lakh |
| 4 | Department of Defence | 65 | 2 | 58 | 1 | ₹8.8 lakh |
| 5 | Health & Family Welfare Department Gujarat | 65 | 2 | 11 | — | — |
| 6 | Education Department Gujarat | 63 | 3 | 36 | 11 | ₹3.1 lakh |
| 7 | Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (mcgm) | 62 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 8 | Department of Atomic Energy | 61 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 9 | Health and Family Welfare Department Chhattisgarh | 61 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Agriculture and Co-operation Department Gujarat | 60 | 1 | 47 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence90/100
17 live · 3.7 bidders avg · L1 ₹16 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 65
- Low competition
- 87
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value
- 100
- 2Ministry of Education61/100
4 live · 4 bidders avg · L1 ₹17 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 84
- Momentum
- 17
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Pmo60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 25
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 25
- Momentum
- 93
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 30
- Momentum
- 70
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 25
- Momentum
- 93
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 67
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 38
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 90 | 17 | 215 | 3.7 | ₹16 lakh |
| 2 | Ministry of Education | 61 | 4 | 92 | 4 | ₹17 lakh |
| 3 | Pmo | 60 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers | 59 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change | 55 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology | 54 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Ministry of Civil Aviation | 51 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Ministry of New and Renewable Energy | 51 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation | 44 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 10 | Ministry of Commerce and Industry | 31 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Gujarat73/100
10 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 54
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Uttarakhand73/100
11 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 96
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Karnataka67/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 69
- Momentum
- 70
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Kerala66/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 62
- Momentum
- 76
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Uttar Pradesh65/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 92
- Momentum
- 24
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Maharashtra65/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 47
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 98
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Jharkhand65/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 41
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Andaman & Nicobar61/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 41
- Momentum
- 80
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Delhi61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 41
- Momentum
- 80
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Tamil Nadu60/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 51
- Momentum
- 70
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 90
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gujarat | 73 | 10 | 146 | — | — |
| 2 | Uttarakhand | 73 | 11 | 24 | — | — |
| 3 | Karnataka | 67 | 2 | 30 | — | — |
| 4 | Kerala | 66 | 2 | 20 | — | — |
| 5 | Uttar Pradesh | 65 | 2 | 101 | — | — |
| 6 | Maharashtra | 65 | 4 | 49 | — | — |
| 7 | Jharkhand | 65 | 3 | 4 | — | — |
| 8 | Andaman & Nicobar | 61 | 2 | 5 | — | — |
| 9 | Delhi | 61 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 10 | Tamil Nadu | 60 | 2 | 10 | — | — |
- 1Dehradun78/100
Uttarakhand ·5 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 90
- Momentum
- 93
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Bhavnagar78/100
Gujarat ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 84
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ernakulam77/100
Kerala ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 84
- Momentum
- 99
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Mumbai76/100
Maharashtra ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 65
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Bangalore74/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 96
- Momentum
- 64
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Jamnagar74/100
Gujarat ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 72
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Vadodara71/100
Gujarat ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 86
- Momentum
- 62
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8South Goa68/100
Goa ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 98
- Momentum
- 30
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Lucknow68/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 57
- Momentum
- 93
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Haridwar67/100
Uttarakhand ·6 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 64
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 67
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dehradun | 78 | 5 | 16 | — | — |
| 2 | Bhavnagar | 78 | 1 | 16 | — | — |
| 3 | Ernakulam | 77 | 2 | 15 | — | — |
| 4 | Mumbai | 76 | 2 | 28 | — | — |
| 5 | Bangalore | 74 | 0 | 26 | — | — |
| 6 | Jamnagar | 74 | 3 | 8 | — | — |
| 7 | Vadodara | 71 | 3 | 15 | — | — |
| 8 | South Goa | 68 | 1 | 27 | — | — |
| 9 | Lucknow | 68 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 10 | Haridwar | 67 | 6 | 2 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
23 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesof 12 awarded bids with the MSE flag
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.