Canteen Service - Best Price on Fixed Menu Rate Model: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Canteen Service - Best Price on Fixed Menu Rate Model on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 51Awarded results: 4Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 51
Closed in period: 760
Awarded results: 4
Median winning price (L1): ₹27 lakh
Avg bidders per bid: 3.7

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

29 Mar 2026

76 Apr 2026

113 May 2026

158158 Jun 2026

115 Jul 2026

84 Aug 2026

100 Sept 2026

110 Oct 2026

26 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	29
Apr 2026	76
May 2026	113
Jun 2026	158
Jul 2026	115
Aug 2026	84
Sept 2026	100
Oct 2026	110
Nov 2026	26

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 22%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 24%
Reverse auction: 1%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Canteen Service - Best Price on Fixed Menu Rate Model86/100
51 live · 3.7 bidders avg · L1 ₹27 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
87
Easy criteria
96
Order value
100
2
Healthcare Kitchen and Dietary Service54/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
21
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
67
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Catering service (Event Based)28/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
10
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Canteen Service - Best Price on Fixed Menu Rate Model	86	51	760	3.7	₹27 lakh
2	Healthcare Kitchen and Dietary Service	54	1	2	—	—
3	Catering service (Event Based)	28	0	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Canteen Service - Best Price on Fixed Menu Rate Model90/100
51 live · 3.7 bidders avg · L1 ₹27 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition
87
Easy criteria
96
Order value
100
2
Healthcare Kitchen and Dietary Service67/100
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
21
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
67
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Canteen Service - Best Price on Fixed Menu Rate Model	90	51	760	3.7	₹27 lakh
2	Healthcare Kitchen and Dietary Service	67	1	2	—	—

1
Rural Development Department Uttar Pradesh73/100
6 live · 2 bidders avg · L1 ₹80 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
87
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
92
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Department of Financial Services68/100
Ministry of Finance ·1 live · 3.5 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
67
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Industries and Mines Department Gujarat67/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
24
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Tribal Development Department Gujarat67/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
49
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Information and Broadcasting66/100
Ministry of Information and Broadcasting ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises65/100
Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
59
Momentum
79
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
94
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Empowerment of Persons With Disabilities64/100
Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
43
Momentum
94
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of School Education and Literacy62/100
Ministry of Education ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
41
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Department of Higher Education62/100
Ministry of Education ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
71
Momentum
42
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Skill Development and Technical Education Department. Odisha62/100
4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
47
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
70
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Rural Development Department Uttar Pradesh	73	6	59	2	₹80 lakh
2	Department of Financial Services	68	1	38	3.5	—
3	Industries and Mines Department Gujarat	67	0	157	—	—
4	Tribal Development Department Gujarat	67	0	11	—	—
5	Ministry of Information and Broadcasting	66	2	6	—	—
6	Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises	65	2	17	—	—
7	Department of Empowerment of Persons With Disabilities	64	0	8	—	—
8	Department of School Education and Literacy	62	3	34	—	—
9	Department of Higher Education	62	3	33	—	—
10	Skill Development and Technical Education Department. Odisha	62	4	6	—	—

1
Ministry of Education71/100
6 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
41
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Finance71/100
1 live · 3.5 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
90
Momentum
56
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises68/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
79
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
94
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Information and Broadcasting68/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment67/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum
94
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers64/100
2 live · 9 bidders avg · L1 ₹46 lakh
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
87
Momentum
27
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
98
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship62/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
66
Momentum
47
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas62/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
54
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Minority Affairs62/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
32
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ministry of Coal60/100
0 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
75
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Education	71	6	67	—	—
2	Ministry of Finance	71	1	46	3.5	—
3	Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises	68	2	17	—	—
4	Ministry of Information and Broadcasting	68	2	6	—	—
5	Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment	67	0	8	—	—
6	Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers	64	2	40	9	₹46 lakh
7	Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship	62	0	16	—	—
8	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	62	2	12	—	—
9	Ministry of Minority Affairs	62	0	3	—	—
10	Ministry of Coal	60	0	5	1	—

1
Gujarat73/100
10 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
57
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
95
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Uttar Pradesh69/100
10 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
93
Momentum
47
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
95
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Delhi65/100
5 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
41
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Odisha65/100
4 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
52
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
80
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Andhra Pradesh65/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Maharashtra64/100
6 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
61
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
88
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Jammu & Kashmir62/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum
56
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Bihar61/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
52
Momentum
70
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
93
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Madhya Pradesh60/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
57
Momentum
54
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
95
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Kerala60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
30
Momentum
94
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Gujarat	73	10	215	—	—
2	Uttar Pradesh	69	10	141	—	—
3	Delhi	65	5	68	—	—
4	Odisha	65	4	12	1	—
5	Andhra Pradesh	65	0	9	—	—
6	Maharashtra	64	6	37	—	—
7	Jammu & Kashmir	62	3	24	—	—
8	Bihar	61	2	14	—	—
9	Madhya Pradesh	60	2	19	—	—
10	Kerala	60	0	4	—	—

1
Rajkot81/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
94
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Jamnagar75/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
78
Momentum
94
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Mumbai73/100
Maharashtra ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
58
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
92
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Gandhi Nagar73/100
Gujarat ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
80
Momentum
87
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
92
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Jammu73/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
67
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Sabarkantha72/100
Gujarat ·4 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
80
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
69
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ranchi71/100
Jharkhand ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Patan70/100
Gujarat ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
70
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
East Delhi70/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
83
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Patna70/100
Bihar ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
59
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Rajkot	81	0	21	—	—
2	Jamnagar	75	0	12	—	—
3	Mumbai	73	3	23	—	—
4	Gandhi Nagar	73	1	12	—	—
5	Jammu	73	2	6	—	—
6	Sabarkantha	72	4	9	—	—
7	Ranchi	71	1	6	—	—
8	Patan	70	3	7	—	—
9	East Delhi	70	0	9	—	—
10	Patna	70	1	5	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

1 wins
1 wins
1 wins
1 wins

4 different sellers won

Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.

See winner names

Bids won by MSE sellers50%

of 2 awarded bids with the MSE flag

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Canteen Service - Best Price on Fixed Menu Rate Model: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor