Canteen Service - Employee Welfare Model: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Canteen Service - Employee Welfare Model on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 10Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-08 – 2026-11-08 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 10
Closed in period: 131
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: 1

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

1 Feb 2026

5 Mar 2026

13 Apr 2026

17 May 2026

20 Jun 2026

10 Jul 2026

20 Aug 2026

3030 Sept 2026

18 Oct 2026

7 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	1
Mar 2026	5
Apr 2026	13
May 2026	17
Jun 2026	20
Jul 2026	10
Aug 2026	20
Sept 2026	30
Oct 2026	18
Nov 2026	7

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 22%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: 50%
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Canteen Service - Employee Welfare Model72/100
10 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
99
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Healthcare Kitchen and Dietary Service32/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
22
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Canteen Service - Employee Welfare Model	72	10	131	1	—
2	Healthcare Kitchen and Dietary Service	32	0	2	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Canteen Service - Employee Welfare Model99/100
10 live · 1 bidders avg · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
99
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Canteen Service - Employee Welfare Model	99	10	131	1	—

1
Indian Oil Corporation Limited79/100
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ·2 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
82
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Power Grid Corporation of India Limited68/100
Ministry of Power ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum
62
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare)66/100
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
93
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Department of Health Research66/100
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
93
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Department of Electronics and Information Technology60/100
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
67
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Indian Railways54/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Skill Development and Technical Education Department. Odisha52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
66
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of Financial Services47/100
Ministry of Finance ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Banking Sector45/100
Ministry of Finance ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Department of Telecommunications (dot)45/100
Ministry of Communications ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Indian Oil Corporation Limited	79	2	25	1	—
2	Power Grid Corporation of India Limited	68	1	11	—	—
3	Department of Agricultural Research and Education (dare)	66	0	4	—	—
4	Department of Health Research	66	0	4	—	—
5	Department of Electronics and Information Technology	60	1	2	—	—
6	Indian Railways	54	0	10	—	—
7	Skill Development and Technical Education Department. Odisha	52	0	8	—	—
8	Department of Financial Services	47	0	4	—	—
9	Banking Sector	45	0	3	—	—
10	Department of Telecommunications (dot)	45	0	3	—	—

1
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas75/100
2 live · 1 bidders avg
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
60
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Power69/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
79
Momentum
65
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
44
Momentum
93
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Ministry of Labour and Employment64/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
38
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum
62
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology59/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
38
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
67
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Ministry of Finance52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
66
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Ministry of Railways52/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
66
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Ministry of Communications47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
49
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Ministry of Defence44/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
38
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas	75	2	35	1	—
2	Ministry of Power	69	2	15	—	—
3	Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare	64	0	4	—	—
4	Ministry of Labour and Employment	64	1	2	—	—
5	Ministry of Health and Family Welfare	61	0	6	—	—
6	Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology	59	1	2	—	—
7	Ministry of Finance	52	0	10	—	—
8	Ministry of Railways	52	0	10	—	—
9	Ministry of Communications	47	0	5	—	—
10	Ministry of Defence	44	0	3	—	—

1
West Bengal76/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
65
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Gujarat72/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
74
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Delhi71/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
96
Momentum
49
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Haryana71/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
89
Momentum
62
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Uttar Pradesh71/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum
74
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
90
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Madhya Pradesh68/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
93
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Telangana68/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
56
Momentum
93
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Kerala67/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
48
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Maharashtra65/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
80
Momentum
41
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Odisha60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
91
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	West Bengal	76	2	15	—	—
2	Gujarat	72	2	8	—	—
3	Delhi	71	1	14	—	—
4	Haryana	71	0	12	—	—
5	Uttar Pradesh	71	2	8	—	—
6	Madhya Pradesh	68	1	3	—	—
7	Telangana	68	0	4	—	—
8	Kerala	67	1	2	—	—
9	Maharashtra	65	0	9	—	—
10	Odisha	60	0	13	—	—

1
Kolkata75/100
West Bengal ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum
62
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ahmedabad73/100
Gujarat ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
70
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Pune70/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
93
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Hyderabad70/100
Telangana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
93
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
South West Delhi69/100
Delhi ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
100
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Gurgaon68/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
76
Momentum
62
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
New Delhi51/100
Delhi ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Dehradun51/100
Uttarakhand ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Sonipat49/100
Haryana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Mayurbhanj49/100
Odisha ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
54
Momentum
0
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Kolkata	75	1	11	—	—
2	Ahmedabad	73	2	3	—	—
3	Pune	70	0	4	—	—
4	Hyderabad	70	0	4	—	—
5	South West Delhi	69	1	2	—	—
6	Gurgaon	68	0	6	—	—
7	New Delhi	51	0	4	—	—
8	Dehradun	51	0	4	—	—
9	Sonipat	49	0	3	—	—
10	Mayurbhanj	49	0	3	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Canteen Service - Employee Welfare Model: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor