Body Worn Camera (V2): GeM business opportunity
Who buys Body Worn Camera (V2) on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 9
- Closed in period
- 84
- Awarded results
- 2
- Median winning price (L1)
- ₹2.9 lakh
- Avg bidders per bid
- 2.5
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 1 |
| Apr 2026 | 14 |
| May 2026 | 9 |
| Jun 2026 | 12 |
| Jul 2026 | 12 |
| Aug 2026 | 10 |
| Sept 2026 | 14 |
| Oct 2026 | 16 |
| Nov 2026 | 5 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 71%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 44%
- Reverse auction
- 5%
based on 87 bids
based on 9 bids
based on 87 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1Body Worn Camera (V2)72/100
9 live · 2.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.9 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 15
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Body Worn Camera (V2) | 72 | 9 | 84 | 2.5 | ₹2.9 lakh |
| 2 | Body Worn Camera Systems (For RAF) as per MHA QRs | 30 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Body Worn Camera (V2)99/100
9 live · 2.5 bidders avg · L1 ₹2.9 lakh · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 99
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Body Worn Camera (V2) | 99 | 9 | 84 | 2.5 | ₹2.9 lakh |
- 1
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 66
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Indian Railways71/100
Ministry of Railways ·3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 41
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
Ministry of Defence ·2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 95
- Momentum
- 24
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 42
- Momentum
- 91
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 67
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 33
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Home Department Odisha51/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 21
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 21
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 21
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 42
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10
0 live · 2 bidders avg · L1 ₹4.9 lakh
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 48
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Forest Department Rajasthan | 72 | 2 | 6 | — | — |
| 2 | Indian Railways | 71 | 3 | 24 | — | — |
| 3 | Department of Military Affairs | 66 | 2 | 21 | — | — |
| 4 | Home and Hill Affairs Department West Bengal | 58 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Central Armed Police Forces | 55 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 6 | Home Department Odisha | 51 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| 7 | Home Department Andhra Pradesh | 51 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 8 | Home Department Daman and Diu | 51 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Home Department Maharashtra | 45 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 10 | Home Prohibition and Excise Department Tamil Nadu | 39 | 0 | 4 | 2 | ₹4.9 lakh |
- 1Ministry of Railways70/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 38
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Defence66/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 98
- Momentum
- 20
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Home Affairs63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 41
- Momentum
- 91
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Ministry of Power35/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Ministry of Finance31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Railways | 70 | 3 | 26 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Defence | 66 | 2 | 25 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Home Affairs | 63 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 4 | Ministry of Power | 35 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Ministry of Finance | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Rajasthan83/100
3 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Gujarat74/100
2 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 78
- Momentum
- 91
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Punjab73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 88
- Momentum
- 68
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Andhra Pradesh66/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 68
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Karnataka66/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 65
- Momentum
- 68
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6West Bengal62/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 72
- Momentum
- 55
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 80
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Maharashtra60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 93
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Uttar Pradesh60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 93
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Tamil Nadu58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 84
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Assam54/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 72
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rajasthan | 83 | 3 | 8 | — | — |
| 2 | Gujarat | 74 | 2 | 4 | — | — |
| 3 | Punjab | 73 | 0 | 8 | — | — |
| 4 | Andhra Pradesh | 66 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 5 | Karnataka | 66 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | West Bengal | 62 | 1 | 4 | — | — |
| 7 | Maharashtra | 60 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
| 8 | Uttar Pradesh | 60 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
| 9 | Tamil Nadu | 58 | 0 | 7 | — | — |
| 10 | Assam | 54 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
- 1Kota83/100
Rajasthan ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Kolkata76/100
West Bengal ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 91
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 67
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Sawai Madhopur75/100
Rajasthan ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Patiala73/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 91
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Tinsukia63/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6North Goa63/100
Goa ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Bangalore63/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Mumbai63/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Nagpur63/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Hyderabad63/100
Telangana ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kota | 83 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 2 | Kolkata | 76 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Sawai Madhopur | 75 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Patiala | 73 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Tinsukia | 63 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | North Goa | 63 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 7 | Bangalore | 63 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 8 | Mumbai | 63 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 9 | Nagpur | 63 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 10 | Hyderabad | 63 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
- 1 wins
- 1 wins
2 different sellers won
Winner names are part of the ₹999 plan and the free trial.
See winner namesof 2 awarded bids with the MSE flag
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.