Bilirubin: GeM business opportunity

Who buys Bilirubin on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.

Live bids: 0Awarded results: 0Live tenders →

Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.

Live bids: 0
Closed in period: 50
Awarded results: 0
Median winning price (L1): —
Avg bidders per bid: —

Tenders published per month

Last 12 months, matching your filters

0 Dec 2025

0 Jan 2026

0 Feb 2026

2 Mar 2026

7 Apr 2026

9 May 2026

1313 Jun 2026

4 Jul 2026

10 Aug 2026

4 Sept 2026

1 Oct 2026

0 Nov 2026

Show as table

Month	Tenders
Dec 2025	0
Jan 2026	0
Feb 2026	0
Mar 2026	2
Apr 2026	7
May 2026	9
Jun 2026	13
Jul 2026	4
Aug 2026	10
Sept 2026	4
Oct 2026	1
Nov 2026	0

How open are these bids?

No EMD needed: 64%
MSE turnover/experience relaxed: —
Reverse auction: 0%

Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.

Top 10: where to work

Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.

1
Bilirubin73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Calcium acetate hydrate43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Sample Cup43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Defibrillator43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
28
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Medical Centrifuge40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
18
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Labolene40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
18
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Blood Lancets40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
18
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Giemsa Stain40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
18
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Glucometer Strips40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
18
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Vertical Autoclave40/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
18
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Bilirubin	73	50	—	—
2	Calcium acetate hydrate	43	2	—	—
3	Sample Cup	43	2	—	—
4	Defibrillator	43	2	—	—
5	Medical Centrifuge	40	1	—	—
6	Labolene	40	1	—	—
7	Blood Lancets	40	1	—	—
8	Giemsa Stain	40	1	—	—
9	Glucometer Strips	40	1	—	—
10	Vertical Autoclave	40	1	—	—

Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria

1
Bilirubin100/100
0 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Live bids	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Bilirubin	100	0	50	—	—

1
Department of Military Affairs73/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Health and Family Welfare Department Karnataka67/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
81
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Health and Family Welfare Department Jammu and Kashmir64/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
72
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Central Armed Police Forces62/100
Ministry of Home Affairs ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
66
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Employees State Insuarnce Corporation58/100
Ministry of Labour and Employment ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Department of Atomic Energy58/100
Pmo ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
51
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Department of Defence47/100
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
41
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Department of Health and Family Welfare43/100
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Health & Family Welfare Department Gujarat43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Higher and Techical Education Department Jharkhand43/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
26
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Department of Military Affairs	73	14	—	—
2	Health and Family Welfare Department Karnataka	67	8	—	—
3	Health and Family Welfare Department Jammu and Kashmir	64	6	—	—
4	Central Armed Police Forces	62	5	—	—
5	Employees State Insuarnce Corporation	58	3	—	—
6	Department of Atomic Energy	58	3	—	—
7	Department of Defence	47	2	—	—
8	Department of Health and Family Welfare	43	1	—	—
9	Health & Family Welfare Department Gujarat	43	1	—	—
10	Higher and Techical Education Department Jharkhand	43	1	—	—

1
Ministry of Defence73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Ministry of Labour and Employment65/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
73
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Ministry of Home Affairs61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
63
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Pmo57/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
49
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Ministry of Mines42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
24
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Ministry of Defence	73	16	—	—
2	Ministry of Labour and Employment	65	7	—	—
3	Ministry of Home Affairs	61	5	—	—
4	Pmo	57	3	—	—
5	Ministry of Health and Family Welfare	42	1	—	—
6	Ministry of Mines	42	1	—	—

1
Karnataka73/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Jammu & Kashmir67/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
83
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Maharashtra63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
68
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Kerala61/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Odisha58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Uttar Pradesh58/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
53
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Gujarat47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Punjab47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Rajasthan47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
West Bengal47/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
42
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Karnataka	73	13	—	—
2	Jammu & Kashmir	67	8	—	—
3	Maharashtra	63	5	—	—
4	Kerala	61	4	—	—
5	Odisha	58	3	—	—
6	Uttar Pradesh	58	3	—	—
7	Gujarat	47	2	—	—
8	Punjab	47	2	—	—
9	Rajasthan	47	2	—	—
10	West Bengal	47	2	—	—

1
Bangalore73/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
100
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
2
Jammu66/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
3
Dakshina Kannada66/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
4
Mumbai66/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
77
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria
100
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
5
Kupwara53/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
6
Mandya53/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
7
Thiruvananthapuram53/100
Kerala ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
8
Amritsar53/100
Punjab ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
9
Bikaner53/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50
10
Agra53/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alert
Why this score
Volume
61
Momentum (not enough data, neutral)
50
Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
50
Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
50
Order value (not enough data, neutral)
50

Show as table

Rank	Name	Score	Closed in period	Avg bidders per bid	Median winning price (L1)
1	Bangalore	73	5	—	—
2	Jammu	66	3	—	—
3	Dakshina Kannada	66	3	—	—
4	Mumbai	66	3	—	—
5	Kupwara	53	2	—	—
6	Mandya	53	2	—	—
7	Thiruvananthapuram	53	2	—	—
8	Amritsar	53	2	—	—
9	Bikaner	53	2	—	—
10	Agra	53	2	—	—

How the opportunity score works

Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.

Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.

Who wins these bids

Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period

No awarded results for these filters yet.

AI business advisor

Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.

Bilirubin: GeM business opportunity

What can you do?

Tenders published per month

How open are these bids?

Top 10: where to work

Who wins these bids

AI business advisor