Air Hoses as per IS 446:1987: GeM business opportunity
Who buys Air Hoses as per IS 446:1987 on GeM, in which states, how many sellers compete and what wins. Change the filters to match your business.
Live bids + bids closed 2025-11-07 – 2026-11-07 (365 days). Includes imported GeM history.
- Live bids
- 1
- Closed in period
- 30
- Awarded results
- 0
- Median winning price (L1)
- —
- Avg bidders per bid
- —
Tenders published per month
Last 12 months, matching your filters
Show as table
| Month | Tenders |
|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 2 |
| May 2026 | 3 |
| Jun 2026 | 6 |
| Jul 2026 | 3 |
| Aug 2026 | 6 |
| Sept 2026 | 7 |
| Oct 2026 | 3 |
| Nov 2026 | 1 |
How open are these bids?
- No EMD needed
- 100%
- MSE turnover/experience relaxed
- 0%
- Reverse auction
- 0%
based on 31 bids
based on 1 bids
based on 31 bids
Turnover, experience, EMD and exemptions come from bid documents and are still sparse; every share shows how many bids it is based on. Results improve as more history is imported.
Top 10: where to work
Ranked by opportunity score (0–100). Open a row to see why.
- 1
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 32
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Coolant Hose31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Helical Gear Box (V2)31/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 20
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Air Hoses as per IS 446:1987 | 73 | 1 | 30 | — | — |
| 2 | PVC Insulated Copper Cable Single Core and Multi Core Circular Sheathed with Rigid Conductor (V2) ISI Marked To IS 694 | 65 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Oil filter assembly for wheel loader | 35 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | PVC Insulated Copper Cable Single Core and Multi Core Circular Sheathed with Flexible Conductor (V2) ISI Marked To IS 694 | 35 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Coolant Hose | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 6 | Rubber Hoses and Hose Assemblies for Water Suction and Discharge Conforming to IS 3549 | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 7 | Helical Gear Box (V2) | 31 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
Fewest bidders per bid, then relaxed criteria
- 1Air Hoses as per IS 446:1987100/100
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 50
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2
1 live · ranked by bid criteria (no results yet)
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 40
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Air Hoses as per IS 446:1987 | 100 | 1 | 30 | — | — |
| 2 | PVC Insulated Copper Cable Single Core and Multi Core Circular Sheathed with Rigid Conductor (V2) ISI Marked To IS 694 | 100 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
- 1
Ministry of Defence ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 32
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Indian Railways68/100
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 81
- Momentum
- 57
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3
Ministry of Power ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 49
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 39
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5
Ministry of Railways ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 24
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Military Affairs | 69 | 0 | 16 | — | — |
| 2 | Indian Railways | 68 | 0 | 9 | — | — |
| 3 | Bhakra Beas Managemet Board | 67 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Ports and Transport Department Gujarat | 37 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Railways Public Sector Undertakings | 32 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Ministry of Defence69/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 32
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Ministry of Railways68/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 85
- Momentum
- 52
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Ministry of Power67/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 49
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Defence | 69 | 0 | 16 | — | — |
| 2 | Ministry of Railways | 68 | 0 | 10 | — | — |
| 3 | Ministry of Power | 67 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
- 1Jammu & Kashmir77/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 83
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Himachal Pradesh74/100
1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 71
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Uttar Pradesh63/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Karnataka62/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Maharashtra60/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 92
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Gujarat42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Rajasthan42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Tamil Nadu42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9West Bengal42/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 56
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Assam36/100
0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 36
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jammu & Kashmir | 77 | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| 2 | Himachal Pradesh | 74 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Uttar Pradesh | 63 | 0 | 6 | — | — |
| 4 | Karnataka | 62 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 5 | Maharashtra | 60 | 0 | 5 | — | — |
| 6 | Gujarat | 42 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Rajasthan | 42 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Tamil Nadu | 42 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 9 | West Bengal | 42 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 10 | Assam | 36 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
- 1Kangra83/100
Himachal Pradesh ·1 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 2Jammu69/100
Jammu & Kashmir ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 3Bangalore69/100
Karnataka ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 100
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 4Mumbai63/100
Maharashtra ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 5Agra63/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 100
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria
- 100
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 6Jaisalmer49/100
Rajasthan ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 7Lucknow49/100
Uttar Pradesh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 79
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 8Sonitpur40/100
Assam ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 9Durg40/100
Chhattisgarh ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- 10Amreli40/100
Gujarat ·0 live
Live tenders →Create alertWhy this score
- Volume
- 50
- Momentum
- 0
- Low competition (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Easy criteria (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
- Order value (not enough data, neutral)
- 50
Show as table
| Rank | Name | Score | Live bids | Closed in period | Avg bidders per bid | Median winning price (L1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kangra | 83 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| 2 | Jammu | 69 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 3 | Bangalore | 69 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 4 | Mumbai | 63 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 5 | Agra | 63 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| 6 | Jaisalmer | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 7 | Lucknow | 49 | 0 | 2 | — | — |
| 8 | Sonitpur | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 9 | Durg | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| 10 | Amreli | 40 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
How the opportunity score works
Score = Volume 30% + Momentum 20% + Low competition 25% + Easy criteria 15% + Order value 10%. Each part is 0–100; a part without enough data counts as a neutral 50.
- Volume: tenders in the period, compared with the biggest row of the list.
- Momentum: share published in the last 30 days vs the average (100 = twice as fast).
- Low competition: 2 bidders per bid = 100, 15 or more = 0.
- Easy criteria: share of read bid documents with no EMD, an MSE/startup exemption or no turnover/experience criterion.
- Order value: median winning (L1) price, compared with the highest in the list.
Who wins these bids
Top L1 sellers in awarded bids of the period
No awarded results for these filters yet.
AI business advisor
Get a short plan from these numbers: where to start, whom to sell to, what to prepare and the risks.